They aren't good fossils because they don't have any bones.
because they don't have any bones or solid structures to fossilize
Jellyfish fossils have been found in sedimentary rock formations around the world, generally in areas where ancient seas once existed. The soft-bodied nature of jellyfish makes their preservation as fossils rare, but in some cases, the impressions left by their bodies in sediment have been preserved and fossilized over millions of years. Scientists use careful excavation techniques to uncover and study these fossils to learn more about the evolution and history of jellyfish.
wood and vegatation but these arent fossils
From the information provided, it can be determined that jellyfish are older than trilobites, and trilobites are older than ammonites. This suggests a chronological order of these organisms in the fossil record, with jellyfish appearing first, followed by trilobites, and then ammonites. This pattern aligns with the principles of stratigraphy, where older fossils are found in lower rock layers.
There are fossils left, ones are constantly forming. Perhaps you aren't looking in the right places
It is possible to find jellyfish fossils, but they are rare because jellyfish have soft bodies that are not easily preserved. In some cases, fossilized impressions of jellyfish have been discovered in certain types of sedimentary rocks that have preserved their soft tissue.
no. they arent, mollusks consist of squids, clams, snails, and jellyfish. so think about it, do any of them have backbones?
good tattoos arent cheap and cheap tattoos arent good.
would a jellyfish make a good fossil
Stingy is a good ish name for a comb jellyfish because they sting you! Deepy is also a good ish name for a comb jellyfish because they live in the really deep sea!
fried jellyfish tastes good right mate
coral reefs in the ocean are good places for jellyfish