Computers per se, can be used to do loads of things (more of intangibles). You can do much more things (load data, do auto-functions/procedures, store programs/electronic books, connect it to a network to surf the world wide web and the like), and it can provide tons of information like books would, however, in space-saver manner.
It dosent effect unand it still give u info but the social thing it dosent harm u it let your reading get batter. And the thing is that it can rip fast. But Lapp doesn't and if u what any info from anther story u have to buy it but the lab it dosent cost money to go to internat
Because the computer is bad for your eyes and you yourself have to take care of YOUR eyes.
They are better because books dont give you a headache and they don't go completely black while your reading.
books make the imagination of the reader work and cause less strain or stress for the eyes. you can take a book almost anywhere you wanna go and read it.
yes dell computers are better than phillip computers!
I think that with books, you have to use your brain more in order to find what you are looking for or use your imagination. It's like reading a book then watching the movie. The book seems to be always better.
Are computers better data processors than humans
way way way better dude
It depends entirely on the computer. No brand is inherently better than another. Computers are the sum of their parts.
yes binders are better
Funny books are better than boring books. If a book is boring why would you want to continue to read the book?
Both have their uses. It depends on the type of research you are doing.
It is unknown if computers will replace books in the future.
If you are looking for his most popular books than i would recommen reading the Lost Hero series. It is better than the Percy Jackson books and are better books for reports.
Positively
Anytime..anyday humans are better than computers because its human who made computers and not vice-versa. so result is clear humans are better