This phenomenon is known as Photo electri emission. Though radiations such as Gamma, X ray, ultraviolet and even visible light are not having massive particles, they are able to eject electrons right from the neutral atoms or molecules.
hydrogen has two hydrogen atoms and two oxygen atoms and water has one hydrogen and one oxygen atoms
Gamma rays are typically hotter than plasma. Gamma rays are high-energy electromagnetic radiation, while plasma is a state of matter where atoms have been stripped of their electrons. Gamma rays can have temperatures reaching billions of degrees, while plasma temperatures are typically in the millions of degrees.
The commonalities that elements, compounds, and mixtures all have in common is that they all contain atoms. Even though they all contain atoms, the number of atoms vary in each of them.
No. At least, I don't think it's reasonable to assume that. The reason it won't work is that, while a gamma ray is still an electromagnetic wave (just like a radio wave is), the wavelength of a gamma ray pulse is extremely short compared to the grid size of a Faraday cage, or even of the individual atoms.
Ionizing radiation can be dangerous to living things, as it upsets the chemistry in living cells by breaking covalent bonds between atoms. Even if the radiation is not ionizing, such as in neutron flux, damage can be done there as well, due to activation processes that change the chemical identity of atoms.
No, Tyvek is not a good gamma ray blocker. We know that Tyvek is HDPE (high-density polyethylene), and KDPE is a hydrocarbon. Even though it is "high density" material, it is only high density compared to other poly plastics. The best gamma ray blockers are materials with high mass. Atoms with high atomic numbers and high density are the ones we need to block gamma rays. Carbon and hydrogen don't fit the bill. Tyvek is a poor choice for gamma ray shielding. What is a good choice for gamma ray shielding? We might choose lead 'cause it's cheap and easy to use as well as a good gamma blocker. Certainly concrete and dirt work fairly well as we can get a lot of that stuff together to provide gamma shielding.
All nuclear decay has some kind of particle or particles associated with it. Even the metastable decay of 4399Tcm, a gamma at 142.7 Kev, is considered to be a particle emission, because a gamma is a photon, and a photon is an elementary particle, per our understanding of modern quantum mechanics and particle physics, even though it has no mass at rest state.
Non ionic atoms have no electric charge, even though most of their particles have charge, because the positive particles (protons) balance the negative particles (electrons).
Non ionic atoms have no electric charge, even though most of their particles have charge, because the positive particles (protons) balance the negative particles (electrons).
No. Oxygen (O2) even if it breaks up into two Oxygen atoms is not ionic. It Is A Covalent Molecule Though.
The negative particles (electrons) are balanced by the positive particles (protons).
It's a pure substance because even though the atoms are different they still the same. If that makes sense?