90 percent loss of energy gets lost at each step in a food chain, and when any consumer has to eat far more food than it ultimately stores as body tissue. If the food contains some material which is not metabolized and cannot be excreted (usually fat soluble rather than water soluble) that material will accumulate in the consumer's body. A carnivore eating the first consumer will receive a high dose of the material, which it, in turn will retain and pass on to the next level if eaten.
Second level carnivores are more likely to be affected by an insecticide than first level carnivores because they get the insecticide of the animal they ate and the one before. Third level consumers would be even more effected.
No. Herbivores always outnumber the carnivores in an ecosystem.
Should be herbivores since carnivores are higher in the food chain.
It is the way nature plays out. The carnivores eat the herbivores, so it is impossible to have more carnivores then herbivores. If there are too few herbivores around, the carnivores begin to starve, so for that reason there will always be more herbivores then carnivores. Most carnivores protect there territories from other carnivores, killing them if necessary, because they instinctively know an area can only support so many carnivores based on food supply -- which for them are herbivores. Also many carnivores are capable of practicing birth control to some degree to keep their numbers appropriate for the number of herbivores that can sustain them.
Plants produce food Herbivores eat plants Carnivores eat herbivores Thus to keep everyone fed there have to be more plants than there are herbivores to eat them (or the herbivores would starve) and more herbivores than carnivores (or the carnivores would starve).
Second level carnivores are more likely to be affected by an insecticide than first level carnivores because they get the insecticide of the animal they ate and the one before. Third level consumers would be even more effected.
A mother and a father carnivore produces more carnivores
I think there is a pretty even amount of carnivores and herbivores. There might be a bit more herbivores because they need more of their species to survive, since the carnivores hunt them.
No. Herbivores always outnumber the carnivores in an ecosystem.
carnivores. or more specifically cheetahs are carnivores
more poo!
Should be herbivores since carnivores are higher in the food chain.
no. There were more herbivores than carnivores and u think all dinosaurs are carnivores! =(
well, men are more affected physically, women are more affected emotionally, if that's what you mean.. Wait, affected by what?
It is the way nature plays out. The carnivores eat the herbivores, so it is impossible to have more carnivores then herbivores. If there are too few herbivores around, the carnivores begin to starve, so for that reason there will always be more herbivores then carnivores. Most carnivores protect there territories from other carnivores, killing them if necessary, because they instinctively know an area can only support so many carnivores based on food supply -- which for them are herbivores. Also many carnivores are capable of practicing birth control to some degree to keep their numbers appropriate for the number of herbivores that can sustain them.
Plants produce food Herbivores eat plants Carnivores eat herbivores Thus to keep everyone fed there have to be more plants than there are herbivores to eat them (or the herbivores would starve) and more herbivores than carnivores (or the carnivores would starve).
Males are generally affected more.