It holds for both static and moving charges. However, when charges move, there are additional forces, other than the coloumb force.
It holds for both static and moving charges. However, when charges move, there are additional forces, other than the coloumb force.
It holds for both static and moving charges. However, when charges move, there are additional forces, other than the coloumb force.
It holds for both static and moving charges. However, when charges move, there are additional forces, other than the coloumb force.
It holds for both static and moving charges. However, when charges move, there are additional forces, other than the coloumb force.
the law is applicable only for STATIC CHARGES
Coulumbs law is applicable only for static fields that is when charges are stationary
from anonymous surfer.... They are equal the only difference is that when the distance of the charge electrons are far so distant from each other, it is much better to apply Gauss's law while Coloumbs law for the other.....
Static charges can be removed by earthing. Since only negative charges can flow the earth takes in infinite number of electrons. This same principal is applied to a lightening conductor since lighting is nothing but the flow of electrons formed due to friction of two clouds.
No. It can exert a much weaker force on neutral objects, due to an induced separation of charges - that is, the charged object will cause a separation of charges in the uncharged object, thus creating an electric dipole.
the law is applicable only for STATIC CHARGES
Coulumbs law is applicable only for static fields that is when charges are stationary
The attractive and repulsive forces between charged particles are there, whether the charged particles move or not. They do not depend on the movement of the charges. This is in contrast with other electrical phenomena, which only appear when there is a movement of charges.
A buildup of electric charge in an object caused by the presence of many particles with the same charge.
from anonymous surfer.... They are equal the only difference is that when the distance of the charge electrons are far so distant from each other, it is much better to apply Gauss's law while Coloumbs law for the other.....
Because if something's an insulator, electrons can't travel through it, meaning that static charges can build up on them becuase they can't go anywhere, whereas conductors just lose the extra electrons as soon as they're transferred onto them.
Static charges can be removed by earthing. Since only negative charges can flow the earth takes in infinite number of electrons. This same principal is applied to a lightening conductor since lighting is nothing but the flow of electrons formed due to friction of two clouds.
No. It can exert a much weaker force on neutral objects, due to an induced separation of charges - that is, the charged object will cause a separation of charges in the uncharged object, thus creating an electric dipole.
Static electricity is not an excess of atoms, but rather differences in the charges of those atoms. Static electricity happens when there is a separation of positive and negative charges caused by electrons moving from one material to another.
Always.
There is a third party stand made by Hori which not only holds the Ds system but also charges it at the same time.
Current electricity requires an energy source, it would not flow unless there is a complete circuit to flow through continuously and it only flow through conductors where as static electricity does not require all of these. Static electricity can have extra protons or electrons and there foe can be either positively or negatively charged. Current electricity is simply the flow of electrons(negative).