Because of a process once begun can generate more complicated problems
If you mean "atomic" as in the Atomic Bomb, then the word "nuclear" could be substituted = Nuclear Bomb.
Well, it was usually considered the official start.
Given the power of modern atomic bombs, it is unlikely that a single atomic bomb could destroy the world. It is doubtful that a single atomic bomb could cause irreparable damage to civilization (given humanity's spread across the planet etc)
there were many
No, the atomic bomb relies on the process of nuclear fission, which produces radioactivity as a byproduct. Radioactivity is essential for the explosive power of the bomb.
The atomic bomb did not exist until 1945, so no it could not be used by anybody in WW1.
It is generally considered to be Los Alamos, New Mexico.
The invention of the atomic bomb did not occur until late in WWII not WWI. There was no such weapon as an atomic bomb in WWI, nor were their any planes that could have handled the weight.
yeah, how else do you think they made the atomic bomb
We never suspected Hitler was making the atomic bomb because we did not think you could split an atom or that a weapon that powerful could be invented.
As a noun. You could always go with "My teacher asked me to use "atomic bomb" in a sentence." Let us know how that works out for you.
If you consider the US atomic bomb is a Christian bomb, the French atomic bomb is also Christian bomb and so on, then you can name the Pakistani atomic bomb an Islamic bomb.