You couldn't eat anything without plants. Every living thing on out planet is dependent on plants. Some eat plants directly (herbivores), while carnivores eat animals (that eat plants), and omnivores eat both.
Humans themselves do not use photosynthesis, but because humans depend on plants, as well as other animals that eat plants, in order to live, no, humans could not live without photosynthesis. Unless plants had another way to make food for themselves, humans could not live without photosynthesis.
Autotrophes do not eat plants. They produce their own energy without consuming other organisms.
Interesting question. Plants don't really "eat". Plants produce sugars from photosynthesis, even plants that seem to "eat" insects are not trapping insects for energy, but for other nutrients such as nitrogen. With this being said, when a plant dies and its nutrients return to the soil, those ions and molecules are absorbed by the root systems of the plants in the immediate area. So in the traditional sense, Plants do not eat other plants, but they are able to derive some of their required molecules from their fallen brothers.
We eat plants and animals. The animals we eat have to eat plants. So, it is safe to say that without them we would starve.In the food chain - plants are at the very bottom of the hierarchy. Plants are believed to feed from the nutrients found in the biological matter (humus) in soil. Animals eat the plants, and so consume the stored nutrients.Since we are animals - some people believe we can simply consume only the plants and live healthy lives. People doing this are called Vegans. Other people believe that we do not need to eat animal flesh (meat) but do require certain elements of our diet from animals, such as eggs from chickens or milk from cows. These people are named Vegetarians.In the animal kingdom, species that eat only plants are called herbivores. Animals that eat only meat of other animals are called carnivores. Animals that eat both plants and meat are called omnivores.
Organisms that eat plants are called herbivores.
You could not eat much because, animals depend on plants and other living things depend on this.
You could not eat much because, animals depend on plants and other living things depend on this.
No because animals eat plants so if animals didnt eat plants the plants would die unless watered.
Photosynthesis is when plants use sunlight to create sugars in their chloroplasts. The sugars are plants' 'food' so without photosynthesis herbivores/omnivores could not eat, and without those, carnivores coul not eat. :)
Since parasitic plants live off other plants, they could be said to 'eat' them.
If we had to we could get oxygen out of water to breathe. But plants can be ate, or feed the animals we eat. So unless we could find a way to manufacture food out of elements we still need plants.
Humans themselves do not use photosynthesis, but because humans depend on plants, as well as other animals that eat plants, in order to live, no, humans could not live without photosynthesis. Unless plants had another way to make food for themselves, humans could not live without photosynthesis.
None existent. Without plants we would have no oxygen to live by, as the plants produce this. We couldn't eat plants, and neither could any other animals. There would be a shortage of food as cows, chickens, and pretty much anything else dies out. Although this wouldn't matter as we'd be dead from the lack of oxygen. Basically no plants = no oxygen and no food.
plants are help ful to animals because they are ugly
No, because without herbivores no mammal would eat plants therefore there would be very high numbers of plants. Without a carnivore, scavengers wont be able to eat food.
Most animals without backbones, known as invertebrates, eat plants.
Autotrophes do not eat plants. They produce their own energy without consuming other organisms.