Because they didnt want to tell the serfs that they were slaves and would want to promise them freedom in a way that is really hard to active because they knew that they couldnt do it
After the serfs gained their freedom, they were able to move about, but they had lost the security of being serfs, who had rights to the land, and so were not really much better off than they had been in many cases. In fact, in some cases, they were considerably worse off.
Lord had to protect their serfs because the relationship between the lords and the serfs was one of mutual obligation. It was a sort of contract, under which each party got benefit, but each party had responsibilities. The serfs gave the lords labor. They also had given up their rights to move away from the manors and were bound to the soil, as they say. This was a two-way thing, however; the serfs did not have a right to move away from the manor, but the lords did not have the right to make them move away from the manor. They lords gave the serfs fields to farm, a place to live, and protection. The protection they provided was from armies, raiders, and criminals, but it also extended to other things, and might, in theory, include provision of food if there was a famine.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
Because they didnt want to tell the serfs that they were slaves and would want to promise them freedom in a way that is really hard to active because they knew that they couldnt do it
he couldnt move fast enough
After the serfs gained their freedom, they were able to move about, but they had lost the security of being serfs, who had rights to the land, and so were not really much better off than they had been in many cases. In fact, in some cases, they were considerably worse off.
Lord had to protect their serfs because the relationship between the lords and the serfs was one of mutual obligation. It was a sort of contract, under which each party got benefit, but each party had responsibilities. The serfs gave the lords labor. They also had given up their rights to move away from the manors and were bound to the soil, as they say. This was a two-way thing, however; the serfs did not have a right to move away from the manor, but the lords did not have the right to make them move away from the manor. They lords gave the serfs fields to farm, a place to live, and protection. The protection they provided was from armies, raiders, and criminals, but it also extended to other things, and might, in theory, include provision of food if there was a famine.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Serfs are Islamic
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
The First Barbie doll could only move her legs up but couldnt bend them.. same with the arms
Helots were serfs - that is they were bound to their plot of land, and to deliver part of its produce to the owner, the city-state of Sparta.
knights protected people by keeping the enemy away from the city or body guarding there serfs
you can't move to the city. you live in your town and you can travel to visit the city but you can't move there.
No! You cannot move out the city.