it depends on if you mean why couldn't they go to school when they were slaves or if when they were freed. they probably wouldn't be aloud to have an education or be smart enough to wonder what the difference between them and their masters are and why they are to be working and not the masters being slaves.
That really depends on which culture's slaves you are making a reference to. In America, it was illegal to teach a slave to read or write-- the government didn't want slaves to get smart and fight back. Knowledge is an equalizer, you see, so if slaves could have access to it, then the owners would become equal.
However, in Muslim culture, being a slave was much better (in the way that being a slave goes...). You could buy your way out of slavery, you could go to school, and if you had children- they weren't automatically slaves-- in fact, if you had children, they were considers citizens. This is the way it worked for the Roman culture too. Americans invented the system we think of as the 'norm' for slavery so they could get more of a profit off of the cheap labor. Messed up, right?
Many slave owners did allow their slaves to read, often having the master's children teach the slaves. Those plantation owners were severely punished if they were caught teaching their slaves.
No, slaves were not allowed to go to school, just work.Slaves did not have education. They worked all day and night at wealthy Roman homes.
Bathing in ancient Rome was by no means a speedy activity.in what order did the process happen
No, unless they worked in the church or with special permission from a clergy man. slaves can go to church they just had to stand somewhere far away, like on a balacony. and that was almost never allowed
a school
Nye Elementary
his family taught him and other than that he didn't go to school
sybil luding ton did not go to school although her brothers did
they had to wear masks. and they couldnt go to school
they had to do chores, they couldnt remarry or ask for a divorce. they were servants to men in the family and they couldnt go to school... you should just google it
They couldnt read properly
Slaves didn't go to school
she did not go to school because slaves where not allowed to go to school
it depends. some slaves had to read or write to go to the underground railroad. so maybe they can go to school. there might be a little private school or they mom might teach them. i my opinion no they did not go to school in general but yes they did go to a school that was a secret.
Clara Brown didn't go to school becuase she was a slave and slaves couldn't go to school.
sharecropping did not cause the civil war but it happened after when they couldnt have slaves anymore
Yes, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 empowered slave hunters to retrieve escaped slaves from free states like Massachusetts and return them to their owners in slaveholding states. The law required citizens and law enforcement officials in free states to assist in capturing and returning runaway slaves, leading to increased tensions and resistance in these states.
They Couldnt buy their freedom, they never had money, that's why it's callled slavery. The slaves were freed by the north
Slaves wore chains as a form of physical restraint and control. Chains were used to prevent slaves from escaping, resist resistance, and maintain domination over them. This practice was a dehumanizing method of control and oppression.
no because they only had slaves working so much that they had to stop school