because general haig did use his logic
General Douglas Haig was the British ruler during the battle of Somme, i think.
Hitler's job in the battle of Britain was to guide the soldiers and make sure that they were successful in battle and did not turn around! no one liked Hitler and he was hated all around the world and still is now by some people however his job of a ruler and dictator was successful if you think about it he ruled the country and killed many people.
What was it like for Great Britain after the Battle?
I am learning about the Battle of the Somme right now. I'm sure that Haig achieved 2 out of 3 of his objectives. He relieved the French and I think was the second one he re-captured a place? Sorry that I don't fully know, but I think that that was one of them. Hope this helped a little bit.
Stalin was involved in the Battle of Britain? I think he just stood back and watched...
i think the allies at the end of the war were Great Britain, US. and the USSR
None, I don't think the Italian Air Force was involved in the Battle of Britain.
they charged at the confederate army
It was less then an even money bet.
I think it may have been in the Battle of Britain. I don't think the Dunkirk battle had any planes involved in that battle but I could be wrong.
Ummmm roughly speaking I'd hazard a guess at precisely.... none ! I don't think the Italian air force was in any way involved in the Battle of Britain.
Because the ideas & plans of the Generals that sent the men over the top were far rmoved from the advances that technology had made in terms of the ability of the defenders to slaughter en masse the attackers moving slowly across no mans land. The truth is that the Generals always fight this war with the ideas trhat prevailed in the previous conflict. That is what History offers as the best laid plan. But it does not move with the times. The machine guns of the German defenders reaped a terrible harvest that no amount of individual bravery could be expected to counter. The attackers were in fact sent to their deaths with little prospect of achieving very much at all: What does it matter whether the front line is here or 2 miles over there ? It was a strategic irrelevance, tactically it was inept. But that is so easy to say with hindsight, what else was to be done at the time ?