0
What else can I help you with?
Was hannibals bold plan to invade Italy a good or bad idea?
While Hannibal's plan did allow him to bypass the Roman army and sack the city of Rome itself, Carthage did ultimate lose the war. It's impossible to know if there was anything that Hannibal could have done "better." It's entirely possible that Rome was always going to win the war no matter what Carthage did, simply because they were so much bigger and more powerful that Carthage had no chance to defeat them. The fact that they prevailed in spite of the capital being sacked certainly adds credence to that argument. One should also note that following the war the Romans destroyed Carthage completely. They did not subjugate it or add it to the empire, but wiped it out of existence. You could, again, argue that they would have done that no matter what, but you could also make the case that they destroyed Carthage because of Hannibal's attack on the city of Rome. If you take those views together, then it was certainly a bad idea, and in the long run only provoked the Romans into even greater reprisals against Carthage. Had Hannibal fought a conventional war then he would still have lost, but the Romans might not have destroyed Carthage completely after their victory.
If you want to be famous is living in New York City bad?
yes get out of there
What are the bad things about the romans?
they were greedy.
What did the Romans top called?
cause that were bad
Was Hannibal defeated?
Hannibal commited suicide by drinking poison which he kept in a ring, because he didn't want the Romans to capture him. His last words were: "Let us now relieve the Romans of their fears by the death of a feeble old man."
Why did the Olympics stop and why were they ressurected?
because the romans thought it was bad
Why did Romans burn people alive?
because they have done a bad crime but Romans always killed peopleso they smell like poo
Were all Romans Christian?
No. All Romans were not Christian. One bad Roman Emperor even blamed Christians for a disaster that he did himself!
What problem did wealthy Romans have?
they had i bad time pooping it hurt when they pooped
Was Hannibal a bad leader?
I think Hannibal was a quite good leader because not many people could at the age of 26 lead an army which consisted of over 70000 people plus he was mercy less to his enimies. Eventhough he was outnumbered he led his soldiers to victory against the romans.
Was cupid a good god or a bad god?
He was considerred a mischevious god by the Romans.
Difference between rich and poor Romans?
Many Romans lived in fancy housing and had luxurious furniture while the poor had insulars[bad houses]. The rich Romans had awsome food and liked to show off.
