weak empire Mesopotamia had a weak empire
Reality:
The fact that city-states are mentioned makes it plain that there was no empire - city-states are what they say - independent states based on a city, and so could not be an 'empire' which connotes centralised rule. And it was this independent status which led them to fighting between themselves. Mesopotamian civilisation was dependent on land and water. Disputed over them drove wars of possession.
Sumerian City-States often fought over Land, Resources, and Water.
Sumerian City-States often fought over Land, Resources, and Water.
because they wanted to
There is no record of Sumerian bladder inflammations fighting one another. The city states, on the other hand, battled to gain resources, territory, and prestige for their rulers.
They went to war to gain glory and control more teritory.
They went to war to gain glory and control more teritory.
Over land and water rights.
Many Sumerian city-states engaged in frequent competition and conflict with one another, often vying for control of resources such as water and fertile land. They would conduct military campaigns to conquer neighboring states or defend their territories. Alliances were also formed at times, but these were often temporary and shifted depending on political circumstances. Additionally, trade and cultural exchange occurred alongside these conflicts, influencing the development of Sumerian civilization.
Matthew ..
Irony is saying one thing while meaning another.
Aruru was a Sumerian fertility goddes, one of the primary eight of Sumerian mythology.
one of the two lettered religious Sumerian citys