0
Why did church officials ownership of land and appointment to high Officials bring the church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
What else can I help you with?
Why did officials' ownership of land and appointment to high office bring the church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
Why did Church officials ownership of land and appointment to high office bring the Church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
Why did church officials ownership of land an appointment to high office bring the church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
Why did church officials ownership of land appointment to high office bring the church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
Why did church officials ownership land and appointment to high office bring the church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
Why did the church officials' ownership of land and appointment to high office bring the church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
In the Byzantine Empire how were officials chosen?
All appointments, both secular and religious, came either directly or indirectly from the emperor. Either the emperor made the appointment himself or he appointed the person who had the authority to make it.
Why did Church officials ownership of the land and appointment high office bring the church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
Why did church officials ownerships of land and appointment to high office bring the church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
Why did church officials ownership of land and appointments to high office bring the church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
Why did church officials ownership of land and appointed to high office bring the church secular power?
because, the christian religion was later split into different sections, the East side & West side. the East side was the only part that helped develop the christian religion, through schools & other ways.
What was the significance of the Lay Investiture Controversy in medieval Europe?
The Lay Investiture Controversy in medieval Europe was significant because it was a power struggle between the Pope and secular rulers over the appointment of church officials. This conflict highlighted the tension between religious and political authority, ultimately leading to the separation of church and state and the assertion of papal supremacy in matters of church governance.
