Because the colonies in America felt that Britain had no right to tax US goods and services.
It represented an attempt to unify colonies and colonists against the Coercive Acts.
(Previous answer irrevelent to question.)
Because it was another attempt by the British to control the colonists who had no representation in Parliament.
The British attempt to seize colonial supplies and leaders at Lexington and Concord
The colonists boycotted British goods in an attempt to not only boost their own economy, but to show Britain how important the colonies were. The colonists hoped the impact of their boycott on the British economy would rally British merchants to their cause while showing Parliament how important the colonies were.
It represented an attempt to unify colonies and colonists against the Coercive Acts.
It represented an attempt to unify colonies and colonists against the Coercive Acts.
It represented an attempt to unify colonies and colonists against the Coercive Acts.
It represented an attempt to unify colonies and colonists against the Coercive Acts.
It represented an attempt to unify colonies and colonists against the Coercive Acts.
It represented an attempt to unify colonies and colonists against the Coercive Acts.
It represented an attempt to unify colonies and colonists against the Coercive Acts.