answersLogoWhite

0

i dont know the freakin answer...hahaha lol

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why did the federalists have more support than the anti federalists?

The Federalists were better organizes and had more experience. Novanet :)


What side did the federalists and antifederalists take on the constitution?

federalist were for the gov't to have more power and the anti-federalist wanted the states to have more power than the gov't.


Why did the Federalist have more support than the anti federalists?

The Federalists were better organizes and had more experience. Novanet :)


Why did antifederalists oppose?

Federalists were people who supported the new Constitution and wanted it ratified to replace the Articles of Confederation. Federalists supported a strong national government with powers to control interstate commerce, the power to tax, and holding more governmental power in the nation than the states. Federalists were one of the first political parties to develop in the US. Anti-Federalists did not favor ratification of the Constitution. Some said they would support it if a Bill of Rights was added. Anti-Federalists favored states' rights and believed a too powerful national government would not protect the rights of the people. Anti-Federalists opposed the political party of the Federalists.


What do anti-federalists believe?

Anti-federalists believe that State government should be more important and more powerful than the Federal government. They also believe that the Bill of Rights is good and that it should be kept.


Why did the federalist have more support than the antifederalist?

The Federalists were better organized than their opposition, and their experiences with Congress during the Revolutionary War showed that a weak central government could not be an effective one.


Which group wanted the states to have more power?

The antifederalists wanted to give more power to the states rather than the federal government. The federalists, on the other hand, wanted an extremely powerful, strong central government. They finally compromised on a constitution when the Bill of Rights were drafted, guaranteeing certain powers to the people and the states.


Who feared oppression more than disorder?

It was the anti-federalists who feared oppression more than disorder. Some prominent anti-federalists included Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry.


What were people opposed to the constitution preferring more power be given to the state governments than to the national government?

Antifederalists


Why did federalists support the ratification of the constitution?

Because the new constitution would give the cenral government more power than it did under the Articles of Confederation, also because the federalist wanted a government wih more power than its states.


Compare the arguments for and against the Constitution made by the Federalists and Antifederalists during the struggle over ratification?

The main agreements between the antifederalist and the federalist were about the bill of rights and the need for a government. The antifederalist demanded to have a bill of rights because it can explain the ideals described in the Declaration of Independence better than the Constitution because the bill of rights gives us freedom of press, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. Also, the federalist felt like it was important to have a government. They both disagreed. This is right luv


Why did the antifederalists believe that the convention had violated congress's original instructions and how did the federalists respond?

one of the early criticisms of the constitution was that the delegates had secretly developed a plan of government that went beyond their instructions. the anti federalists argued that the delegates had done far more than proposing amendments to fix the problems with the articles of confederation's delegates had created a new system of government. this concern was exemplified in a letter written by "A Republican federalist" to the members of Massachusetts state convention. He stated that " that the original design of forming the convention has not been carried into effect." Therefore. since the delegates acted in violation of their instructions," ....they ceased to be a federal convention, and had no more right to propose to then United States the new form of government, than the equal number of gentlemen ..." The Federalists did not grant the point to the Antifederalists. James Madison spent all of the fortieth essays in the federalist series to explain how the convention had actually done its work within the context of the instructions from congress.