Want this question answered?
is the bad mae
He wanted to instill confidence in the American people, to make them believe that with his leadership they really had nothing to worry about. I doubt that he made any deep analysis of the aspects of fear. the belief that nothing bad could be done
bad....very bad
One of the bad things of isolationism is that it can lead to bad things happening in other countries. These bad things can at some point impact your own country. Another bad thing about it is that it can lead a country to not really understand what is happening in other parts of the world. This can be dangerous.
you may want to change that to are the government bad people , and no.
he did what now one did he wet to the Spanish's king and they become friend s i wondered if they said bad words and they said a lot.
francisco vesques faced bad conditoin faught pig,horses,dinesors,and fougt the big tommy that is big from tommy
Spanish explorer Francisco Vazquez de Coronado was born into a prestigious family. He was not in line to inherit the family's wealth, so he went to sea to make his fortune. It is not known whether he had a formal education.
What I meant was WAS Francisco Pizzaro a bad man! My bad :P
Some of Francisco Vasquez de Coronado's challenges when he explored the southwest include the harsh desert terrain, extreme temperatures, lack of water, and resistance from Native American tribes. He also faced difficulties in finding the fabled cities of gold that he had hoped to discover. Additionally, his expedition was plagued by disease, mutiny, and the challenges of navigating unknown territory.
bad
uh...... there are none
yes it did
Bad leadership,we have very very very bad leaders
bad leaders are not respectful,loving caring,outgoing, and have good leadership.
There can be several causes of 'bad leadership', depending on what the leader experiences during his/her moment in power. Also, it does move into the category of what bad actually means, and that it depends on the eye of the beholder. For one example many people consider Hitler to have been a 'bad' leader, but some believe Hitler to have led well. Bad leadership is often not caused by the leader, but by the events which take place during his or her leadership. For an example somebody may say that Gordon Brown has led badly, but others may blame it on the events which have taken place, for example the credit crunch, which Gordon Brown could do nothing to stop. Bad leadership could be caused if the leader was unwise in his decision, it could happen in many ways, it is all dependent on the eye of the beholder, on what the people believe to be bad leadership, for example Labour MPs may believe Mr Browns leadership to be outstanding (this I highly doubt), but Conservative MPs may believe Mr Browns governing policy to be completely attrocious. In conclusion, I believe that 'bad leadership' is completely dependent on the moods of the people, and leadership could be considered good by the people in one country, for example communism, but if that leadership moves to another country it is considered bad.
Bad leadership and corruption