his army were on top of a hill and they had command over the French. So the French ran at the English and then ran away, the English broke ranks and chased the French and were cut down by the French cavalry. So it wasn't his fault it was his army's lack of discipline, because they were are farmers and only a few were proper soldiers.
Harold Godwinson successfully defended England against Danish invaders. He was defeated at the Battle of Hastings by William of Normandy in 1066.
Harold Godwinson lost the Battle of Hastings because they did not keep there shield wall. The Norman's used a tactic that faked a retreat and the Saxons ran after them. Then the Norman's turned around and thrashed them.
battle of hasting 1066
Well, William would've had to do to lose the battle of hastings, such as: Not having good enough Tactics, Luck, and Resources. He was Sly, and had good Idea's, which helped alot. Hope this works for you...x--x--x love georgi walkerxx
Harold lost the battle of Hastings for many reasons some say it's because of his men as William had hundreds of TRAINED men with armor and swords and with all the front line of the soldiers being on horse back while Harold had farmers with pitch forks and anything they could get there hands on (and all were on foot so this gave William an advantage of being able to swoop down and kill those below them). Another known reason is that Harold's army had just won the battle with Harald up North and where recovering/resting when the news came that William was down in the South with his army so Harold and his men then had the long march (55 miles roughly) down to William and because of the lack of transport and food etc Harold lost a large number of men on the march and those who survived were utterly exhausted and needed to rest but they went straight into the Battle of Hastings. Moreover William was very prepared when he arrived in the South with his army. He built himself a fort out of wood and the reason for this is that William knew that Harold would be marching down to fight him off and a wood fort would take less time to build than if he were to build it out of stone. The final reason i know of is that Harold lost control of his army during the battle as William played the retreat and attack defence where William pretended to retreat and as the English chased then off (braking the wall that they made so the Normans couldn't get through) suddenly the Normans would turn round and surround them this of coarse meant that everyone of the English would die if they fell for this evil trick (which they did 3 times.) So when William tried this Harold ordered his men to stay of course though some men refused and chased after them sure of victory no sooner had they done this the Normans then surrounded them. When Harold was once killed (by an arrow in his eye which was unlucky seeing as that was the only non covered part) all of his men realised now that Harold was dead there was nothing to fight for anymore so now thy needed to save there own necks, they'd lost. So there are some of the reasons why Harold lost the Battle of Hastings.
no
William of Normandy, later known as William the Conqueror, is not recorded to have lost any significant battles during his military campaigns prior to and during the Norman Conquest of England in 1066. His most notable victory was the Battle of Hastings, where he defeated King Harold II. While he faced challenges and skirmishes, his strategic prowess and leadership resulted in a successful military career.
Harold was defeated by William the Conqueror because he was outmaneuvered and outarmed. William the Conqueror used cavalry and archers, while Harold left his behind to protect another area.
It happens for many reasons like if their was a data fault and a loose fuse
Battle of Chancellorsville
Dien Bien Phu
no i dont think so from what i know it was the relatives fault for letting the animal get loose