there was chaos otherwise
there was chaos otherwise
thomas hobbes
Thomas Hobbes believed that the purpose of government was to protect people from their evil ways or own selfishness.
Thomas Hobbes
Hobbes believed that people were naturally evil, while Locke did not.
Hobbes believed that people were inherently evil, while Locke argued people were born as blank slates.
Hobbes believed that people were inherently self-interested and needed a strong, authoritarian leader to maintain order and prevent chaos. He argued that without a powerful ruler, society would descend into a state of war and conflict.
Thomas Hobbes believed that people are inherently selfish and driven by self-interest, while John Locke believed that people are inherently rational and guided by natural rights to life, liberty, and property.
Thomas Hobbes believed that all people are naturally selfish and wicked, advocating for strong central authority to maintain peace and order.
Thomas Hobbes
Hobbes believed that since people are basically selfish and badly behaved, the population needs a strong ruler to control them.
Thomas Hobbes believed in a strong central authority to maintain order and prevent chaos, while John Locke emphasized the importance of individual rights and limited government power. Hobbes thought people were inherently selfish and needed a social contract for protection, while Locke believed in natural rights and the consent of the governed.