Answer 1
Humans did not leave the trees for the simple reason that they were never in the trees to start with.
Our forefathers, ape-like creatures, eventually left the trees most likely because they 'learned' to walk up-right, use bones and stones as tools and weapons and caves for shelter. Since there was no longer an advantage in being able to climb trees and life there, we simply lost that ability.
Other animals have experienced similar adaptations. The Kakapo for example is a kind of parrot which lives solely in New Zealand and which has lost the ability to fly for the simple reason that it did not have any enemies, no predators which could attack and eat it. It therefore did not need the ability to fly away when attacked and as a result, it lost that ability.
There is a very interesting video of a talk by Douglas Adams recorded at the University of California in which he describes the interesting and evolutionary adaptations of the Kakapo and other animals. The video is nearly 90 minutes long but educational and very funny. See link below in Related Links.
Answer 2
There are various hypotheses explaining what might have driven the ancestors of H. sapiens to adapt to a life in the plains rather than in and amongst trees. One is that a climatological chance slowly drove certain tribes of apes from their preferred habitates; another factor may be increasing population numbers and competition; it may have been simple curiosity or chance, that drove primates to try their luck at first the outskirts of their preferred habitat and then beyond them. Frankly, I doubt we'll ever know with any certainty what, out of a million possibilities, brought our ancestors from the trees.
Yes, humans and trees engage in a process known as gas exchange, where humans release carbon dioxide through respiration, which is then absorbed by trees during photosynthesis. In return, trees release oxygen, which humans inhale for respiration. This symbiotic relationship helps maintain a balance of gases in the atmosphere.
Biotic: Humans, Trees, Fruits because they depend on tree leaves and fruits to survive, but humans are cutting down necessary trees.
a man's lungs takes oxyzen , give it to the heart . the heart uses it and mix it with carbon and forms carbondioxide. man releases this carbondioxide and give it to trees. trees take the carbondi oxide and uses it in the process of photosyn thesis and forms oxyzen and give it to the man .
humans affect the taiga biomes and animals by cutting down trees that are homes to other animals.
I think it is a chanpazine
Yes, ficus trees are not poisonous to humans.
Humans can actually help trees because we breathe out Carbon dioxide when trees take in but when we cut down trees then we kill it.
Humans and pine trees both inhabit the planet Earth.
the leave a right trees
Trees take in Carbon Dioxide and release Oxygen. We as humans breathe in this Oxygen.
for wood
because humans cut all the trees . trees are also living being and they destroying all the animals
No i believe they do not cause humans get oxygen from trees animals really are not different from humans so animals get the oxygen from trees just like humans
humans have been cutting trees down
Bears leave marks on trees to communicate with other bears, mark their territory, and sharpen their claws.
They clear trees in the rainforest
No