answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did justice Marshall rule the supreme court that could not issue the writ Marbury requested?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What did john marshall accomplish as chief justice of the supreme court in marbury v Madison?

One of John Marshall's accomplishments was to make the supreme court a co-branch of government. He did this when he was chief justice of the United States.


Who was the supreme court justice for the Marbury vs Madison case?

Fourth Chief Justice John Marshall presided over the Court in 1803, when the case was finally allowed to go to trial. Chief Justice Marshall authored the opinion of the Court for Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803). Marbury v. Madison is the case most often cited when discussing the origin of judicial review.For more information about Marbury v. Madison, see Related Links, below.


Who was the Chief Justice who established the US Supreme Court as the final interpreter of the Constitution?

Fourth Chief Justice John Marshall, in the US Supreme Court case Marbury v Madison, (1803).


Federalism under marshall court?

Federalism had a strong-hold under Marshall Court. John Marshall, a Federalist, was the 4th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.


Who said a law repugnant to the constitution is void?

Cheif Justice John Marshall in the Supreme Court case Marbury vs. Madison.


What did john marshall accomplish?

John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. He is basically considered the "father of the supreme court." He established many important judicial precedents. In Marbury v. Madison, Marshall established the concept of judicial review.


In the US Supreme Court's opinion was Marbury entitled to his appointment?

Yes. In the opinion of the Court, Marshall declared Marbury was entitled to his commission, but that the Supreme Court didn't have original jurisdiction to issue the writ of mandamus Marbury requested. Marshall explicitly stated Marbury would have to refile his case in a lower court first, then appeal to the Supreme Court if he failed to get relief at that level. Marbury never refiled his case.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Was judicial review associated with the Supreme Court and John Marshall?

Yes. Chief Justice John Marshall is directly associated with the Supreme Court's use of judicial review due to the opinion he wrote for Marbury v. Madison, (1803).


Did William Marbury ever get the commission that Marbury v Madison said he had a right to?

No. In the opinion of the Court, Marshall declared Marbury was entitled to his commission, but that the Supreme Court didn't have original jurisdiction to issue the writ of mandamus Marbury requested. Marshall explicitly stated Marbury would have to refile his case in a lower court first, then appeal to the Supreme Court if he failed to get relief at that level. Marbury never refiled his case.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What chief justice marshall decision in the case of marbury v. Madison?

Marshall used the case of Marbury v. Madison to establish the principle of judicial review, the authority of the Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional laws. Today, judicial review remains one of the most important powers of the Supreme Court.


What was Chief Justice Marshall's decision in case of Marbury v Madison?

Marshall used the case of Marbury v. Madison to establish the principle of judicial review, the authority of the Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional laws. Today, judicial review remains one of the most important powers of the Supreme Court.


What landmark case was chief justice john Marshall involved with?

John Marshall was the Chief Justice during the 1803 case Marbury vs. Madison. This case increased the Supreme Court's power when Marshall established the principle of judicial review. This gave the Supreme Court power to overturn laws passed by Congress on grounds of unconstitutionality.