why did life Ericson come to the new world
He was searching for new lands to colonize.
He was looking for new lands to colonize.
He was searching for new lands to colonize.
He was looking for new lands to settle.
He was searching for new lands to colonize.
He was searching for new lands to colonize.
He was searching for new lands to colonize.
Yes.
Neither, Lief Erikson found the new world in 1100-1200. But Christophor Columbus found it in 1492 after lief erikson left so he gets credit for it. ---------------------- While the above is correct, to help with the Columbus / Raleigh issue that is raised here the following facts are relevant. Christopher Columbus is credited with finding the new world (actually he first saw the Bahamas) at 2 a.m. on October 12, 1492. He did not actually reach the American mainland until his third voyage in 1498. Sir Walter Raleigh was not born until about 1552 (his exact date of birth is not known). Thus Columbus' voyages of the new world predate Raleigh by at least 50 years.
In the year 1002 or 1003.
It was too far.
Well the first people in the new world would have to be the cavemen who crossed the land bridge a long time ago. No one came to the new world till Christopher Columbus "discovered" it in the 15th century. And vikings in 1000 (lief the Lucky)