one person ruling limits the expansion of the law for that it may or may not include what others say.
Because of you r mom
Your mom! ancient Greece
First the kings, then the oligarchs, then the tyrants, then the democrats, then the oligarchs, then the kings.
It started with kings, then oligarchs, then tyrants, then oligarchs, then a democracy, then oligarchs, then kings.
They got there power by over throwing the Oligarchy
A conqueror. It was not a tyrant - tyrants were appointed to put an end to autocratic rule by oligarchs and give the mass of people fair treatment.
Their dominance became resented, so the people supported tyrants to keep to keep them in check. To avoid assassination by the oligarchs a tyrant had to hire a bodyguard, and to pay them he had to impose a tax which upset the people, who eventually tired of this and got rid of him.his opened the gate for the oligarchs again, however the people turned to leaders who promised them democratic rights and so eliminated oligarchic rule. The democracies were fragile, as the people could easily be led astray by opportunistic leaders; and so reverted to oligarchic, tyrannic or monarchic rule.
Their dominance became resented, so the people supported tyrants to keep to keep them in check. To avoid assassination by the oligarchs a tyrant had to hire a bodyguard, and to pay them he had to impose a tax which upset the people, who eventually tired of this and got rid of him.his opened the gate for the oligarchs again, however the people turned to leaders who promised them democratic rights and so eliminated oligarchic rule. The democracies were fragile, as the people could easily be led astray by opportunistic leaders; and so reverted to oligarchic, tyrannic or monarchic rule.
They take it. There is nothing like voting involved.
They take it. There is nothing like voting involved.
oligarchs
they included laws that were fair to alll
Tyrants. Note: In Ancient Greece, the word "tyrant" meant "ruler," not "evil despot."