It didn't, it was just the primary place for slaves because that was where the plantations were. The soil in the South is a lot better for growing things and there were a lot of things to grow and a huge need for workers.
yes. in the early history of America, it was almost necessary for southern plantation owners to have slaves. But most families in the south only had one or two slaves.
False
Slaves were only in the south. None in the north.
slaves werent supposed to be literate during slavery so they only became literate when they escape from the south
the slaves in the south were freed by the Emancipation Proclamation.
If only the South would have granted freedom to the slaves.......
South
How indian slaves were brought to South africa?
Many slaves in the south worked on large plantations
The South. The only slaves in the Union were in the four Border States of the Upper South (Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, Delaware), where there was less pro-slavery sentiment than in the Deep South. But of course it was the North that received a constant influx of liberated slaves, who were eventually absorbed into the Union armies.
Without slaves the south couldn't trade or have as much business then they had with slaves. The north benefited of this because the south was getting more help in building weapons with slaves then they did alone.
South Carolina had the most slaves. 57% of the population of the state were slaves