Wegner's Theory was not agreed with because most of his evidence was circumstantial. When we were able to get views from outer-space and were able to dig more accurately for fossils, it became clear that the continents could have been connected at one time
No, scientists did not immediately agree with the continental drift theory proposed by Alfred Wegener in 1912. Many geologists and scientists of the time were skeptical because Wegener could not provide a convincing mechanism for how continents could move. The theory gained more acceptance later, particularly with the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century, which provided a scientific framework explaining the movement of continents.
they couldn't agree on how it separated or what made it separate.
Answer: Certainly not.
People did not agree with Alfred Wegener because he could not provide a driving force for his theory of Continental Drift, now known as Plate Tectonics. People used to think that the crust of the Earth was solid, so how could continents move about in something solid? It was only when it was proved that there were 2 types of crust, Ocean and Continental, and that the ocean crust was relatively new, that geologists were able to work out a driving force for the whole process. Convection currents in the mantle.
If nearly all scientists agree with a theory, it may be called a scientific consensus. This consensus indicates that the theory is well-supported by extensive evidence and has undergone rigorous testing and peer review. While scientific consensus doesn't guarantee absolute truth, it reflects a strong level of agreement among experts in the field based on current knowledge.
Girolamo Fabrici
the continental army
Most scientists and archaeologists agree that nomadic hunters and seafarers migrated to the Americas from Asia, specifically crossing the Bering land bridge around 15,000 years ago. This theory is supported by genetic, archaeological, and linguistic evidence.
I believe most scientists would agree that this is not currently known. Some, however, would say that there was no "before" - that time itself started with the Big Bang.
h
I believe most scientists would agree that this is not currently known. Some, however, would say that there was no "before" - that time itself started with the Big Bang.
I believe most scientists would agree that this is not currently known. Some, however, would say that there was no "before" - that time itself started with the Big Bang.