Want this question answered?
do you have the answers to antthing
The outcome of the war deeply hurt Germany and it people because during the World War 1 Germany went through inflation which affected its economy greatly. After the Treaty of Versailles and the Paris Peace Treaty all of the blame was formally put on Germany and Germany was blamed for the cause of the war. People in Germany began to resent the fact that they alone were blamed for the war which caused the rise of Hitler and the second World War.
One possible consequence for wartime women who worked in factories when men began returning from overseas after the war was that men would get their jobs back. This would leave the women without work. Another consequence was that men would resent them.
For the most part receptively, but still bitter at the brutal tactics employed by the Union and the mess that became reconstruction. Reconstruction was really a failed effort after the assassination of Lincoln. Though Andrew Johnson had a very conciliatory approach to reconstruction, but being a southerner himself he failed to gather the support of Congressional Republicans and many Democrats. The final result was a bureaucratic mess of reconstruction that left the south broke and technologically backward. Even though the ending of slavery was a just cause, the north still acted unnecessarily unforgiving toward the south and left the south without an economy. The real point is that southerners (then and now) resent northern states and politicians because of how poorly Reconstruction was carried out. In fact, its only been in the last 15 years that the automotive and aerospace industries have begun filling the economic void left by the forceful end of slave-driven agriculture. Southerners didn't respond well, but really because of the massive incompetence of northern politicians.
Reputable historians and others argue that WWII was a continuation of WWI. I see things a little differently. WWI did not leave any 'unresolved' issues per se, it was essentially the last war between the monarchs of Europe. At the end of the war, boundaries were drawn and a peace was agreed to. HOWEVER, the Versailles Treaty did impose harsh terms on Germany. These harsh terms were at least partly to blame for the economic instability which occured in Germany during the 1920s. It was precisely this type of economic instability which led to the downfall of the Weimar Republic which led to the rise of Hitler.Try reading "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" by William L. Shirer, or "The Gathering Storm" by Winston Churchill. Michael MontagneIf you mean 'Was World War 2 inevitable (given the defeat of Germany in World War 1)?' then I think the answer is 'no, it was not inevitable'.Historians write with hindsight, which distorts. In popular history in the U.S. (and elsewhere) there is a strong tendency to write about the Weimar Republic (1919-33) as if it were one great build-up to the Nazis' rise to power. In the 1928 general election in Germany the Nazis won 12 out of about 580 seats in the Reichstag and were widely regarded as a joke, led by a funny little man with wild gestures and a ridiculous little moustache. In fact, the main build-up was in the Great Depression.Many answers on this site assume that Germany seethed with resentment at the the Versailles Treaty and then went to war again in 1939 to 'rectify' grievances. This view is misleading, too. Most German conservatives were bitter about the treaty, but it was above all the Nazis, from about 1930 onwards who actively encouraged a sense of grievance. Peopls were constantly urged to attibute their misfortunes to events at the end of World War 1. The sense of grievance became a kind of cult.So, the idea that the one world war simply led to the next needs treating carefully. Without the Great Depression it's very hard to see how the Nazis could have come to power.Having said all this, there was a sense in which the underlying cause of both World Wars in Europe was very similar. Both were driven by an attempt by Germany to change its status - from that of a (regional) European great power to that of a world power. In other words, there were significant underlying continuities - however, without the one leading to the other.I hope this helps and that it isn't too complicated.Joncey
they are the people that resent Jewish people
Irk
he really doesnt resent them he's mad and everything he says in the argument makes it sound like he does.
Catholicism
Not all of them. Only the Tlaxcalans.
Since the Portable Health Care Act (Obama-care), Managed Care is replacing Private Insurance. However, people still resent managed care programs.
Poor people in France resented the rich due to economic inequality, perceived social injustice, and lack of access to opportunities. The stark contrast in living standards and the perception of the wealthy as exploitative or indifferent contributed to resentment among the poor.
The word "resent" in French is spelled "ressentir."
some think he was a good man who tryed to help mexicans, but others resent the fact that a german was installed to rule mexicans
Hormones, jealousy, embarrassment, fear, denial
Because people were sent to live in there house.
Wanted to own land