Want this question answered?
No the poor Victorians have no money but the rich one did have lots of money poor Victorians had to work and rich Victorians had poor one to work for them
The Victorians treated the children by making them work hard, giving little food to them and,sometimes beating them.
They had to work for about 13 hours a day and the started work when the were about 5/4
now wear because they were to poorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr that's why they had to work
Rich Victorians wouldn't have to work as they would be aristocrats or royalty. Middle-class Victorians were: Children-factory workers, chores at home, or help out with the family business Women-if they were unmarried they would work as teachers or get married and help around the house Men-doctors,millitary officers, local government officers not so sure about poor ones but they had the worst of the worst or nothing at all
In my opinion she was quite cruel when she brought the rule that children had to work and children was BOUGHT to work in those times and it was allowed however she also did come up with the rule that children could only work what they could actualli be able to do. Victorians also came up the rule that all children had to go to school, and queen Victoria's reign brought improvements to the education of children, especially to the poor children.
no rich people could afford money so they go to school so they are educated more then poor.
Some Victorians pitied the poor and tried to be charitable to them. However, the prevalent systems in dealing with the poor were based on Malthusian and utilitarian ideals. Basically, Malthusian thought said that the poor reproduced at a rate that would eventually put a strain on the food supply. For that reason families were separated in the workhouses: Victorians were very opposed to public sexual displays, so needless to say that they wouldn't have taken any of the few chances they had to make a baby. The utilitarian view is what encouraged the creation of the workhouses to begin with; the idea was that if the poor were allowed to live in their own homes, they wouldn't work harder to provide for themselves, so they were placed in the worst living conditions imaginable to give them a reason to work harder to leave.
no
work in a workhouse's
Victorians had workhouses as a solution for poverty relief and a way to provide work and shelter to the poor. However, they were also seen as a deterrent to idleness and were designed to be harsh to discourage people from seeking assistance unless absolutely necessary.
he devoted himself more and more to prayer and charitable work, especially with the poor and marginalised. He was especially drawn to the plight of poor children whose parents could not afford to send them to the paying schools of the time.