Because the climate would not support plantations, which made slavery profitable.
Central Asia, I would think the Urals would be the correct answer Southwest Asia, I would think the Himalaya would be the correct answer.
It is probably safe to assume that if Abraham Lincoln had not become president, that we would not still have slaves today. Another president would have likely done the same.
the compare of the southwest is that the southwest are Indians so you just think of something that no other regions would think of doing my name is Kristen Armitage and that is your final answer.
It was important because if he wouldn't have became president we would be slaves right na
From what I've read, I think that the purchasers would ask the slaves to walk for them, and they would look to see how strong they looked and what they would be good for.
I would think that they didn't like it too much.........
yes
Then most African Americans would still be slaves, and Barack Obama would not likely be our president. It's improbable that the slaves would never have been freed, because Northern abolitionists were so passionate about it they would have continued fighting until slavery was ended.
That would be the Emancipation Proclamation.
No, because if they did do you think the slaves would escape at all, yeah that's what I thought!
He was not against nor for slavery. he would free the slaves if it helped end the war or not free the slaves to help end the war.
well if you know anything about Abraham Lincoln then you would know that he was the president to end slavery. Mr.Lincoln wouldnt have any slaves if he thought that slavery was cruel and unfair. If a person abolishes something then they most likely think that idea is wrong.