The participation of Tobruk in World War 2 is a long story. I have attached a link for you to read the story.
draft
Defeat, Communism and loss of territory.
by sounding dumb!
Since a Utopian is one who seeks an ideal world, he would be a passivist and oppose all war.
Socialists tended to oppose U.S. participation in World War I because they viewed the conflict as an imperialist struggle that primarily served the interests of capitalism and the wealthy elite. They believed that the war would exacerbate social inequalities and distract from the labor movement's goals of achieving workers' rights and social justice. Additionally, many socialists argued that the resources and lives lost in the war could be better spent addressing domestic issues such as poverty and inequality. Overall, they advocated for solidarity among the working class across national boundaries rather than involvement in nationalist conflicts.
Socialists and WWIIn fact, the vast majority of socialists in Europe did NOT oppose WWI. Those who did oppose the the war said that that particular war was irreconcilable with fundamental socialist convictions about the 'brotherhood of mankind'. This view was shared in some European countries by a very small number of Liberals. On the whole those socialists who opposed WWI found themselves pushed further and further to the Left and formed the basis of future Communist parties.Please note that in the U.S., where socialism has always been very weak, the situation may have been different.Joncey
Generally speaking, the Left-wing in the US tends to oppose participation in wars.
During World War I, many naturalized American citizens had close relatives - commonly parents - who were still German citizens in Germany. Their brothers and sisters back in the "Old Country" might wind up facing American Doughboys in battle.
Socialists opposed U.S. participation in the war primarily because they viewed it as an imperialist conflict that served the interests of capitalism rather than the working class. They believed that the war would exacerbate social inequalities and divert attention from domestic issues like labor rights and economic justice. Additionally, many socialists argued that the war would lead to increased militarization and repression of dissent, undermining democratic and socialist movements.
They wanted the united states to avoid interfering in world politics
Vladimir Lenin was leader of the radical socialists who took over Russia in World War 1.
I'm puzzled by the question. German women did not 'oppose World War 1'.
Eugene V. Debs
how did Russia participation in the world war 1 lay the seeds for the Bolshevik revolution
Nova Net Review Test Answer: They wanted the United States to avoid interfering in world politics.
world war 2