weak empire Mesopotamia had a weak empire
Reality:
The fact that city-states are mentioned makes it plain that there was no empire - city-states are what they say - independent states based on a city, and so could not be an 'empire' which connotes centralised rule. And it was this independent status which led them to fighting between themselves. Mesopotamian civilisation was dependent on land and water. Disputed over them drove wars of possession.
Sumerian City-States often fought over Land, Resources, and Water.
Sumerian City-States often fought over Land, Resources, and Water.
because they wanted to
They went to war to gain glory and control more teritory.
They went to war to gain glory and control more teritory.
There is no record of Sumerian bladder inflammations fighting one another. The city states, on the other hand, battled to gain resources, territory, and prestige for their rulers.
Athens and Sparta .
Almost invariably over farmland and irrigation water.
They went to gain more land and irrigation water. Also, to gain glory.
They went to gain more land and irrigation water. Also, to gain glory.
inanna
The Sumerian war panel, often depicted in bas-reliefs, reveals a society deeply engaged in conflict and warfare, reflecting its values and social structure. It illustrates the importance of military prowess and leadership in Sumerian culture, showcasing soldiers, chariots, and the celebration of victories. Additionally, such art often emphasizes the role of the king as a central figure in warfare, symbolizing power and authority while also highlighting the collective identity and communal effort of the society in times of conflict. Overall, the panel encapsulates the intertwining of art, politics, and societal priorities in ancient Sumer.