Want this question answered?
Twenty Satrapies (Provinces).
yes
I guess you refer to Darius I (the Great) the third king of the Achaeminid Empire (the Persian Empire at its greatest extent). He divided the empire into provinces and placed satraps (governors) to administer them. It was a creation of administrative subdivisions.
he divide the empire into two provinces because King Darius appointed Satraps or governors to rule various provinces in his empire for easier governance. By appointing Satraps, he was free from mundane daily bureaucratic issues of ruling an empire that streched from the northern borders of India, the entire Middle East and all the way to Libya and parts of Greece.
The Assyrians controlled their empire using a powerful military and by torturing dissidents.
The Ottoman Empire had 29 provinces.
No. The Assyrians were conquerors. They ruled the powerful Assyrian Empire.
The Assyrians were very strong in transport of goods so they started out talking through their empire by this way
Assyrians descended from the Sumerians and Akkadians. When the Assyrian Empire began, they were technically the Sumerians and Akkadians, but there was no "Sumerian Empire" or "Akkadian Empire" at that time. There was earlier, but not then.
Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.Yes, the Roman empire did divide their empire into provinces. This division served two purposes, the first being making their vast territories easier to govern and to collect taxes and the second to reward ex-officials and help them regain the funds they had to lay out in order to get elected.
the Assyrians
No, it had 20 provinces.