The Nubians were not as dependant on the flooding of the Nile, so they had no need to trade by water.
i really dont have a clue. answer it ur self bubs
it was the most convienent way to get somewhere or get something somewhere else.
Ones which go by land rather than waterways.
The land routes were supplemented by sea routes which extended from the Red Sea to East Africa, India, China, and Southeast Asia. In the late Middle Ages, transcontinental trade over the land routes of the Silk Road declined as sea trade increased.
yes he conquered many of the important trade routes.
i really dont have a clue. answer it ur self bubs
The nubians were not as dependant on the flooding of the Nile, so they had no need to trade by water.
Because of the cataracts, people could not travel through Nubia by river. Instead, the Nubians developed trade routes over land.
It came about when they didn't use money so they used a method called bartering. Nubians carried goods from central Africa and Nubia into Egypt and southwestern. They developed trade routes over land, and they boosted the affiliation between Nubia and Egypt. The trade along the Nile river came from them using boats and other crafts to trade with other parts of Egypt along the Nile river.
Trans-Saharan trade routes were primarily land based, the Silk road was both land and sea.
Trade routes
The Mongols disrupted international relations through their conquests and establishment of a vast empire, which led to political, economic, and cultural exchanges across Eurasia. Their military campaigns brought about power shifts and redefined trade routes, causing existing political structures to be challenged and reshaped. The Mongol Empire's control over vast territories influenced diplomacy and interactions between regions, fostering both unity and conflict among different states.
It came about when they didn't use money so they used a method called bartering. Nubians carried goods from central Africa and Nubia into Egypt and southwestern. They developed trade routes over land, and they boosted the affiliation between Nubia and Egypt. The trade along the Nile river came from them using boats and other crafts to trade with other parts of Egypt along the Nile river.
No. Trade routes through water were dangerous (pirates, storms, etc.) Trade routes through land were also dangerous...usually due to extreme conditions (dessert, etc.)
it was the most convienent way to get somewhere or get something somewhere else.
One reason was that it was an easily defended area. A second reason was that it controlled the trade routes from east to west by land and by sea.One reason was that it was an easily defended area. A second reason was that it controlled the trade routes from east to west by land and by sea.One reason was that it was an easily defended area. A second reason was that it controlled the trade routes from east to west by land and by sea.One reason was that it was an easily defended area. A second reason was that it controlled the trade routes from east to west by land and by sea.One reason was that it was an easily defended area. A second reason was that it controlled the trade routes from east to west by land and by sea.One reason was that it was an easily defended area. A second reason was that it controlled the trade routes from east to west by land and by sea.One reason was that it was an easily defended area. A second reason was that it controlled the trade routes from east to west by land and by sea.One reason was that it was an easily defended area. A second reason was that it controlled the trade routes from east to west by land and by sea.One reason was that it was an easily defended area. A second reason was that it controlled the trade routes from east to west by land and by sea.
Trans-Saharan trade routes were primarily land based, the Silk road was both land and sea.