Commanders being at the back was not a Roman peculiarity. It has been a characteristic of armies throughout the world and throughout history and it is still practiced today. There are two reasons for this. One is that if the commander is at the front, his chances of being killed or seriously injured would be much higher and if the army becomes leaderless, it is likely that it would be routed. The other reason is that being at the back gives the commander a better view of the battle front and how it unfolds, which is needed to be able to make tactical choices and to make tactical changes which may become necasary as the battle unfolds.
The most important meeting place for Romans was the Forum.
They are in the deepest place in mt. coronet:spear pillar.
They inventedthe Colosseumarmorfigthing place
colosseum
Romans are from Rome Italy Romanians are from Russia. Romania is a country or state inside Russia.
So they could get from place to place
I know that the Romans did track racing (Romans created the olympics).
The Persian War lasted for fifty years - two generations so it changed over time. Also there were sea commanders and land commanders. Also, each of the two hunderd Greek city-states had its own commanders. You will have to narrow the question down to time and place.
There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.There are all sorts of commanders, but a Christian can be one.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
it is a place where romans eat in summer.
yes