To pay for all the damage from the French and Indian war.
The British didn't define this. They perceived that there was no need for a bunch of (American) colonisst to have representation, since they thought that their governing status was just fine. It was the American colonists who stated that they did not want to pay taxes to the British unless their interests were adequately represented in Parliament. When this idea was rejected, the conditions for revolution ripened.
After the British, with the help of the colonists, had defeated the French in the French and Indian War (1756-1763), they acquired much more territory in need of protection against Indian attacks, including not only soldiers but forts and weapons. The British were deeply in debt from the war. The British Parliament thought it was reasonable to tax the colonists to help pay for the increased cost of protection, even though it was mostly the British monarchy and not the colonists already in place who would mostly benefit from the expanded territory.
After the British, with the help of the colonists, had defeated the French in the French and Indian War (1756-1763), they acquired much more territory in need of protection against Indian attacks. They would have to pay more soldiers, build more forts, and buy more weapons and ammunition. But the British were deeply in debt from the war. The British Parliament thought it was reasonable to tax the colonists to help pay for the increased cost of protection, even though it was the British monarchy and not the colonists already in place who would mostly benefit from the expanded territory.
Because he taxed the people of another land for his country's profit.
The reason any government levies taxes--to pay for services. In this case the taxes paid for the Redcoat's salaries, their guns, cannons, ships, etc. Part of the money also paid for the normal services any government must provide--courts, law enforcement, infrastructure, etc. And don't forget good old King George. He must get his share. That is his right, as the King of England. It would be interesting to see the breakdown of where the tax money went.
MANY British prime Ministers have introduced new taxes- you need to be specific over which taxes you are referring to.
Another way instead of the Boston Tea Party that colonists might have done to protest the Tea Act was not buying the British tea. If many colonists didn't buy tea from Britain or just stop drinking it then the British wouldn't be making a profit from that sale and this would anger them because they need money. Maybe the British would lower the prices or make a compromise with the colonies.
After the British, with the help of the colonists, had defeated the French in the French and Indian War (1756-1763), they acquired much more territory in need of protection against Indian attacks, including not only soldiers but forts and weapons. The British were deeply in debt from the war. The British Parliament thought it was reasonable to tax the colonists to help pay for the increased cost of protection, even though it was mostly the British monarchy and not the colonists already in place who would mostly benefit from the expanded territory.
Thomas Paine used persuasive techniques such as figurative language. His analogies compare King George to a 'common burglar.' He used words to imply a need for urgency such as, 'we must act now to assure we aren't subjugated any more by the king and Parliament.' He creates an argument that God only loves the colonists, not the British to imply the colonists are on a higher plane than are the British.
After the British, with the help of the colonists, had defeated the French in the French and Indian War (1756-1763), they acquired much more territory in need of protection against Indian attacks. They would have to pay more soldiers, build more forts, and buy more weapons and ammunition. But the British were deeply in debt from the war. The British Parliament thought it was reasonable to tax the colonists to help pay for the increased cost of protection, even though it was the British monarchy and not the colonists already in place who would mostly benefit from the expanded territory.
That is too vague to answer, You'll need to clarify what you're talking about.
Explain why the colonists felt the need to be free from British rule.