if the higher social standing people didnt surpress the lower class they wouldn't of had the back bone they needed to make it an empire. the lower class woul dbe free to do as the pleased. and that wouldn't be in the best intrest of the empire of those who didnt have to work to survive
It was mainly on inequalities of both male and female.
In classical civilizations, philosophical ideas such as Confucianism in China emphasized hierarchical social structures, reinforcing class distinctions. Additionally, in Ancient Greece and Rome, Stoicism and natural law theories were used to justify gender inequalities by promoting the idea of women's inherent inferiority. These beliefs were often grounded in cultural norms and traditions that upheld the status quo of the time.
It is to remove inequalities from the economy
I have the same question. But I'm resourceful. https://apworld.wikispaces.com/page/code/Compare+the+caste+system+to+other+systems+of+social+inequality+devised+by+early+and+classical+civilizations,+including+slavery
Social Democrat Radical Party was created on 1863-12-27.
Independent Radical Social Democratic Party ended in 1924.
Independent Radical Social Democratic Party was created in 1921.
You solve inequalities by making it easier for the individuals who have less to overcome their circumstances. For governments, creating social programs will help the less fortunate.
b
If inequalities exist as a result of social stratifcation.
Classical liberalism emphasizes limited government intervention in the economy, individual rights, and free markets, while contemporary liberalism supports government intervention to address social and economic inequalities, and places a stronger emphasis on collective welfare and social justice. Classical liberalism is rooted in the ideas of individual liberty and minimal state interference, while contemporary liberalism seeks to use government to address societal issues and promote equality.
By exploiting other member states