Want this question answered?
It tallies because our accounting is based on double entry book keeping. So debit and credit side are always equal.
So far as I know, Double Entry System and Double Account are not differing in the essential character. They only differ in the way the information is presented. What is presented in Double entry system as profit and loss account is presented in Double account system as Revenue account, Profit and Loss Appropriation account as Net revenue account and what is called Balance sheet is segregated into General balance sheet and Receipts and Expenditure on capital account. The difference in the presentation is also due to the fact that the two systems of accounting serve differing purposes. Double entry places emphasis on the Profits and losses and results of operations while Double account places emphasis on whether adequate provisions are made and whether reserves are sufficient.
Advantages of double entry system In this system two aspects (Dr. and Cr) of the transactions are entered so it is beneficial to following ways. 1-Trial Balance can be prepaid for the checking of arithmetical accuracy. 2- All accounts (Personal, Real and Nominal) are entered properly. 3- It can be helpful for making perfect Balance sheet.
I think that a journal entry is in the format of an essay, so I would say at least five paragraphs...but actually, i honestly don't think it matters, as long as you get the point across...hope this helps!
Correct the transaction so that the double entry also increases the right hand side of the accounting equation so that the equation (always) balances.
It lasted for so long during the medieval times because the inventor of double-entry bookkeeping Amatino Manucci, managed to construct a comprehensive and fully-articulated set of double-entry records with a regular balancing procedure on closure of the General Ledger. Moreover, he gave importance to the aspect of financial control.
the justinian code lasted so long because it was fair and justifing
American were upset because the crisis lasted so long
There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.
d6dcddfok not sure
There's a comment on GeekPress (url: http://www.geekpress.com/2007_07_monthly.html) about the long reentry blackout. It quotes Gene Kranz, the Flight director to the effect that the re-entry path for Apollo 13 was longer and shallower than normal, thus extending the re-entry blackout. The re-entry blackout was from 142.39 to 142.45, and lasted 1.27 longer then normal.
the justinian code lasted so long because it was fair and justifing
cuz of knowledge!
the playdo was much stronger back in the day
Isolation and lack of outside influence.
well remember the war lasted 5 or 4 years so not long
the justinian code lasted so long because it was fair and justifing