I dont know thats why im asking you
The war less damaging to the economy of the North than to that of the South because most of the war and battles occurred in the South resulting in loss of farms, crops, and any industry near any battle site.
The third statement is untrue. The Northern advantage in manufacturing industry was most significant, especially in the increasingly mechanised farming techniques.
Because the North was into manufacturing instead of agriculture as the south was.
They travel more or less from the north to the south.
Generally speaking, the 1800s were less technically advanced than now, although industry was booming. Culture and human behaviours and attitudes were very different from how we know it now.
The south was not as powerful as the north. The north had more advantages than the south. The south had less transportation and not as many weapons.
The North is less industrailized than South Korea .
There was some slavery, for a time, in the North, but there were more crops in the South than in the North, e.g. less need in the north.
False; the North had far more soldiers than the South.
Slavery was less successful in the north due to the fact that the north was more of a merchant society than the south was. Slavery was more "necessary" in the south because of the vast amount of farmland that was present in the south. The north however, relied more on trading/
Less agriculture, more industry
this will not answer my question this will not answer my question it can be less than one inch, or it can be from the north pole to the south pole. depends