Since the people of America had just broken off from England due to a bad king they were very hesitant towards a new government.They made sure that if they were to have a ruler his powers must be within limits. They also needed a "ruler" who would do good for their new flourishing country, so they picked Washington.
u7
The criticism of the Texas constitution is that it did not limit the power of government enough. The constitution of the state would be re-written to limit government power in the state.
In writing state constitutions, Americans were well aware of the problems that had led to the Revolution. Colonists had been unhappy with governors appointed by the British Crown. Thus, the new constitutions minimized the powers of state governors.
The US Constitution provided a limited amount of power to the government and explicitly stated that any power not given by the constitution to the national government is automatically power of the state governors.
If the state law conflicts with the constitution or federal laws it'll get thrown out.
Yes, governors have the power to pardon criminals in their state.
The president
The people were led to writing state constitutions to limit the power of the governs because the governs thought that they could rule the their state they way they wanted. Also the people thought they weren't being treated right.
H
Yes and no. The governors have no legal way to remove a president from his office in the constitution. Governors can however call for a constitutional convention and make a new constitution. So yes they can remove a president, just not quickly.
The US Constitution does not make provisions for state governors. Each state constitution sets out the requirements to be a governor of that state; the term of office and the term limits.
A little bit