0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did the Supreme Court rule against Scott in 1857?
no
What was the ruling of the appeals court before McCulloch v Maryland came before the Supreme Court?
The US Supreme Court case, McCulloch v. Maryland, (1918) was initially heard in Baltimore County Court, where a Maryland citizen, John James, sued James McCulloch for failing to pay taxes levied against the Second Bank of the United States. James hoped the court would rule McCulloch had to pay the taxes and that he (James) would collect a portion as a reward. The Baltimore County Court judge upheld Maryland law and found against McCulloch.The case was then appealed to the Maryland Court of Appeals, which affirmed the County Court decision (naturally, the Maryland State courts would uphold their own state laws).McCulloch v. Maryland reached the US Supreme Court on a writ of "Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland."Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
How did supreme court rule in McCulloch vs Maryland?
They said that a public official has more power than a state does.
How did the Supreme Court rule in McCulloch vs. Maryland?
They said that a public official has more power than a state does.
Who can rule that federal laws are unconstitutional?
(Supreme Court)
Can the state Supreme Court over rule the federal Supreme Court?
No
What supreme court diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
In 1819 the supreme court used the supremacy clause to rule that the state of Maryland to tax the federal bank?
had no power to tax the federal bank
What supreme court case diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
What is a Made up of nine justices who review and rule on court cases?
supreme court
If the supreme court does not rule on an appeal case what is the result?
The decision then remains what it was when appealed to the Supreme Court.
Did the supreme court allow the use of Lethal Injection in Kentucky?
The supreme court did rule that the use of Lethal Injection in Kentucky were not allowed and that it was against the eighth amendment, (cruel and unusuall punishment). They then banned it from Kentucky.
