Want this question answered?
the u.s. used non nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons against japan
An antinuker is a person who is against the concept of making nuclear weapons.
It does in a certain regards .if a state ,lets say iran, develops nuclear weapons it effectivly acts as a deterent against aggression from ..well the primary global aggressor ,united states .compromising their abillity to continue an oppressive global dominance agenda.that is why washington is in such fanatical opposition towards irans nuculear energy program.
No. Even if Kenya has plans concerning nuclear technology it is totally against nuclear weapons. In fact, obeys th NPT and it's pursuing the idea of the total elimination of nuclear weapons
nuclear weapons
intentionally launch nuclear weapons against it.
Japan doesn't want any nuclear weapons.But Japan can easily produce nuclear weapons if it wanted to. It has the technology to build nuclear weapons within 1 year-- probably a few months if it wanted.However, most Japanese people are against nuclear weapons. Therefore, they do not have nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapons have only been used in anger in the Second World War (WW2) - they were used against the Japan to bring the war to an end.
The primary mission of the fleet ballistic missile submarine is deterrence. By deploying these submarines, we are sending aggressor nations a message. That message is that we have nuclear and other strategic weapons on a platform that can be positioned just about anywhere in the ocean and used to retaliate against any nation that is overtly aggressive toward us or our allies.
Nuclear weapons are a good thing for the United States because they prevent others from using nuclear weapons on the US. In general, the world would probably be a better place without nuclear weapons if it weren't for the fact that they lead to research in all fields of Nuclear Engineering, like Nuclear Power plants and Nuclear Physics. Since nuclear weapons already exist in the world, for the US to get rid of their nuclear weapons would be unwise. Countries that dislike nuclear weapons or even radical terrorist cells and organizations would now have no reason not to launch a nuclear warhead at the US since no retaliation would occur. The strategy of nuclear weapons preventing others from using them against the US is called the Deterrent Strategy.
They feel the need to have nuclear weapons so they have protection against nuclear threats or actually anykind of threat. Countries might be Iran, Iraq, Russia(U.S.S.R)
Mutually Assured Destruction is the concept that if someone attacks another they would respond by totally destroying the aggressor, but in the process of doing the destruction the original aggressor would be forced to totally destroy their original victim. Its acronym of MAD is very appropriate as it is mad to be the first aggressor as it would result in their own destruction. It is appropriate with respect to nuclear weapons as superpowers have enough of such weapons to totally destroy the others, and so none would start a nuclear war (to destroy someone) because the other side could/would respond in an equally destructive manner (destroying them).