because they do not earn the same amount of income
because they do not earn the same amount of income
Different income groups, (upper, middle, and lower class) have different spending patterns for a number of reasons such as the lack or abundance of funds, financial mentality, desire vs. ability to attain luxury. Financial Priority as pertaining to social economical status also plays a large role in motivated spending. There are some who would go on to suggest that the IQ's of those in both the lower and upper bracket are directly related to their social economical status; IE, The less intelligent, the lower the status, etc. Which would, if it where the case, play another large role in specific spending patterns.
Different income groups, (upper, middle, and lower class) have different spending patterns for a number of reasons such as the lack or abundance of funds, financial mentality, desire vs. ability to attain luxury. Financial Priority as pertaining to social economical status also plays a large role in motivated spending. There are some who would go on to suggest that the IQ's of those in both the lower and upper bracket are directly related to their social economical status; IE, The less intelligent, the lower the status, etc. Which would, if it where the case, play another large role in specific spending patterns.
The government spending multiplier is different form the tax multiplier from the top of my head is because the government spending total effect ripples off. That is if government spending increase then the total income increases. When total income increase, consumption increases, when consumption increases total income increases further (as consumption is a factor of total income), and this pattern is carried forward. This is the the multiplier effect, such that an increase in government spending's final impact on income is much bigger than its initial increase. The tax multiplier on the other hand, has a much smaller effect than government spending. This is because tax is only a portion of the consumer income. That is, if there is a tax cut, consumers only save a fractional amount (specifically 1-MPC) of a tax cut. As a result of the smaller boost in spending form ma tax cut, the ripples/multiplier effect of a tax cut is much less than an increase in government spending.
Increases in income allow for more disposable income which increases spending and the demand for goods. Decreases in income conversely decreases disposable income which decreases spending.
economic cycle
Discretionary spending
Deficit spending.
discretionary spending
We can do it
What type of software could be used for each of the followingcalculating household income and spending?
Both the increased spending by the national government and the nationally imposed income tax