Edison, the inventor of DC, tried his hardest to convince the public that Tesla's AC that was more dangerous, but DC is far more dangerous. If you are shocked wit high-current DC, you do not have a "kickback" type reaction where you will jump away from the wire. Instead, the constant signal of DC causes you to hold on to the wire against your will, worsening the shock.
Voltage without current is not dangerous. Similarly, current without voltage is not dangerous. Think of voltage as the desire to hurt you, and current as the muscle to carry though with it; or voltage as the speed of a river, and current as the amount of water in that river.
120V out of a power outlet can be more dangerous than a taser because the outlet has both - 120 volts is enough to arc to your body, and if you are grounding yourself well (through a pool of water), it has enough umph to guide the current through you.
The taser, on the other hand, provides large amounts of voltage, which overrides your brains' signals to your muscles and tells them all to contract. It does not provide enough current, though, to harm you (or it isn't supposed to).
A car battery can provide massive amounts of current, but at only 12 volts, it is not enough to cause you serious harm.
Current and voltage are related via Ohm's law: V = I*R. If you think of your body as the resistance in Ohm's law, you can see that you cannot separate voltage and current. A low voltage will not cause a high enough current to harm you (such as a car battery). It is not as clear from Ohm's law, but still true, that a high voltage may not be able to induce a high current, and thus may be harmless as well - this is the case when you rub your feet on a carpet and touch an outlet - the spark is indicative of a relatively high voltage, but there aren't enough extra electrons built up on your body to cause a high current, so the shock you feel is harmless.
This is really a 'chicken and egg' situation. It's the current passing through your body that does the damage, but the amount of current depends upon the voltage that the body is subjected to. The higher the voltage, the higher the resulting current. So the two are really very closely linked. In a way, your question is rather like asking, "Which is the most dangerous, falling from a tall building or hitting the ground?"!
DC is generally held to be more dangerous because it is more difficult to interrupt and if arcing occurs it can sometimes be prolonged, while an arc in an ac switch usually goes out when the current passes through zero during the natural ac cycle, which is a time of less than 10 mS on a 50 Hz system (8.3 mS on a 60 Hz system).
in case when a human body comes in the path of an electric current then in the case of ac there are chances of survival because of negative polarity but in the case of dc this chance is zero.
alternating current is easier to transfer long distances
Transformers increase and decrease voltage as needed. PLATO
Less loss when transmitting over long distances.
In a series circuit, then yes, there is only one pathway. For example: if one bulb fuses, all the bulbs in the serial circuit will go out. But there are more pathways in a parallel circuit. For example: if one bulb fuses, all the other bulbs in the parallel circuit will still light.
Not usually. A transistor is an amplifier, that can be used as a switch. If set up correctly it can be used to rectify AC current (i.e. convert it into DC), however it will need a capacitor to smooth the DC current (i.e. keep the voltage constant or nearly the same). What is typically used is a rectifier, a small circuit consisting of one or more diodes.
direct current
yes it is very harmful
alternating current is easier to transfer long distances
Depending on how it's used, it can mean air conditioning, or it can mean alternating current (as electrically powered) as opposed to battery powered (DC, which is direct current). Or Animal Crossing
Alternating current is more efficinent. It is wireless and more efficient than direct current. And it is safer. Plus Tesla is better than Edison
A direct current involves change of flow in a single direction. DC (direct current), at least on the macro scale. On the atomic scale, they seem to wander all over the place between atoms, and the average movement is what we measure as current.
No, This will act in reverse.Note: This will act only for alternating current and there will be no effect on direct current.
No, it is the same. DC stands for direct current rather than AC, which is alternating current.
alternating current is easier to transfer long distances
A diode will let current pass through only in one direction. Note that this will result in a pulsating current; to make the current more regular, you also need capacitors.
Generators produce electricity as direct current and Alternators produce electricity as alternating current. As alternators produce electricity more effeciently, and they are smaller and lighter and are used in modern vehicles.A generator creates direct current in the manufacture of power. An Alternator creates alternating current in the creation of power. Alternators can have diodes installed internally so that they have a D.C. output.
It's a decision based on efficiency of power transmission.