Biological organisms do NOT violate the laws of thermodynamics. Some people mistakenly think that because they assemble into complex structures they must be in violation of the 2nd law. This is not true. The 2nd law does not preclude the assembly of complex structure, it says that any such process will produce more entropy in the universe - so the decrease in entropy of the plant, animal, bacteria, or biological organism is accompanied by an even greater INCREASE in the entropy of the universe.
Biological organisms do not violate the laws of thermodynamics. Instead, they operate within and are subject to these laws. Living systems utilize energy from their environment, taking in nutrients and converting them into useful forms of energy. While biological processes are able to maintain and increase order locally, the overall entropy of the universe continues to increase in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics.
No biological entity violates any of the laws of thermodynamics.
Bear in mind that in science, all laws are part of theories. Thermodynamics has 3 laws, and is also a theory.
The understanding of the laws of thermodynamics (natural phenomena) made it possible for engineers to design and build air conditioners (technological products).
this increase in organization over time in no way violates the second law. The entropy of a particular system, such as an organism, may actually decrease, so long as the total entropy of the universe-the system plus its surroundings-increases. Thus, organisms are islands of low entropy in an increasingly random universe. The evolution of biological order is perfectly consistent with the laws of thermodynamics.
There are three laws of thermodynamics, not inlcluding the understood fourth law. Thermodynamics is the study of how energy is transferred in a system.
No biological entity violates any of the laws of thermodynamics.
Yes. To live forever would violate the laws of thermodynamics. The only way not to would be to have no changes, which would not be living.
If you are suggesting a "perpetual motion" scenerio, it would violate the first or second laws of thermodynamics. Many inventors dream of perpetual motion machines, but they are an impossible dream according to the laws of thermodynamics. The second law of thermodynamics says that an engine or process of any type must always have an efficiency of less than 100%. A perpetual motion machine that uses a generator to power the motor that runs the generator requires both the generator and motor to operate with 100% efficiency. This type of perpetual motion machine does not violate the first law of thermodynamics, but violates the second law of thermodynamics. It is a perpetual motion machine of the second kind because it violates the second law of thermodynamics. Not even the cleverest engineer or inventor can build a perpetual motion machine because it would violate either the first or second law of thermodynamics, which are fundamental laws of physics.
Thermodynamics is part of physics.
It is not respected, as rulers violate laws as they please
Scientific rules and laws concerning thermodynamics.
Bear in mind that in science, all laws are part of theories. Thermodynamics has 3 laws, and is also a theory.
It's not possible because it would violate one or both of the laws of thermodynamics. The first law of thermodynamics says that you can't create energy from nothing, or to out it another way, you can't get more energy out of a machine than you put into it. The second law says that no machine is 100% efficient. You must actually get less energy out of a machine than you put into it. The laws of thermodynamics apply to the entire universe and all bodies within it, including alleged perpetual motion machines.
Thermodynamics
True
If you violate laws or if it expires. Or if you didn't get it legally. If you violate laws or if it expires. Or if you didn't get it legally.
No. The laws of thermodynamics were fully operationallong before anybody knew anything about math.