Because Man has taught us not to change the interpretation of The Bible not God:) Another reason might be that like many Christians, fundamentalists would simply be seeking to do whatever God wants them to do. In order to do this they would need to determine what God's clear will is wherever possible. They would believe along with many other Christians that the best way to do this is to read the Bible as it is intended by the various authors to be read. This means poetry is read as poetry, history as history etc. Included in this would be the idea that the Bible is authoritative for Christians insofar as it is relevant to their circumstances. Allegorical and other types of non-literal interpretations tend to impose a meaning on the text which often can be coming from the personal bias, tradition, or doctrinal slant of the interpreter and are in a sense imposed on the text from outside. The exception to this is of course where the text itself is an allegory. Further to this, the Bible itself has a number of principles for its own interpretation.
20Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.21For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
Thus, since the Bible is not ultimately man's creation, he has no right to interpret it as he pleases, according to his own private views, but is just there to listen and submit to its teaching. Although this kind of thing is really a 'no-no' in any situation, taking Bible verses out of context is particularly invalid as it usually alters the meaning or the understanding to something which was not intended.
Essentially nothing. If you insist on a precisely literal interpretation, the theory does contradict the book of Genesis in the Bible.
It is changing a literal interpretation to an allegory.
Fundamentalists were Protestant believers who strongly resisted liberal Protestantism's attempts to adapt doctrines to Darwinian evolution and biblical criticism. They believed in a literal interpretation of the Bible and rejected the idea of evolution and critical scholarship of the Bible.
Fundamentalism Characterized by the belief in a literal, or word for word, interpretation of The Bible.
With regard to evolution, it is generally the interpretation of Genesis as a literal, scientific document. People with a dogmatic view of The Bible are often very hostile toward science, as they believe that anything that contradicts their understanding of the Bible must be false, even if it has been proven scientifically. Having said that, I have nothing against fundamentalists.
They believe the Bible is the sole rule of Faith and stress its literal interpretation.
I would say that a "Christian who doesn't take the Bible too seriously" is not really a Christian. Literal interpretation is a different issue. Those who don't would/could be called "Progressive Christianity" (or Progressives).
Because they feel it disagrees with a literal interpretation of Genesis......they will say that evolution has no scientific evidence to support it and try to come up with arguments against it, but the bottom line is they just don't WANT to believe it, and so reject it at face value.
Using the text of the bible to prove the truth of the Bible is a great example of circular logic. However, not every person has learnt to analyse and think logically. Nor is it important if fundamentalists believe in the literal accuracy of the Bible for reasons that do not stack up, as long as they do not seek to impose their beliefs on others.
In the 1690s, Newton wrote a number of religious tracts dealing with the literal interpretation of the Bible
Fundamentalism is based on the literal interpretation of the Bible. Some of noted movements in U.S. history include the Great Awakening with three or four waves occurring from the early 18th to the late 20th century.
If you believe in a strict literal interpretation of the bible then yes, there are unicorns mentioned therein.