0
Historians look for evidence to support their understanding and interpretation of the past. Evidence helps validate their arguments, provide context, and support conclusions about historical events and figures. By examining various forms of evidence, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do historians analyze evidence?
Historians analyze evidence by examining its reliability, relevance, and context. They assess the source of the evidence, its bias, and corroborating or contradictory evidence to form a well-supported interpretation of the past. Additionally, historians use critical thinking skills to evaluate the perspectives and motives of the sources providing the evidence.
What were historians looking for to find Atlantis?
Historians have searched for archaeological evidence, ancient texts, and geological studies to locate Atlantis. They look for any clues that support the existence of a lost civilization that matches the descriptions provided by Plato in his dialogues. However, no definitive evidence has been found to confirm the existence of Atlantis as a historical reality.
What are techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
How do historians identify the Neolithic revolution?
Historians identify the Neolithic Revolution through a combination of archaeological evidence and the study of ancient texts and artifacts. They look for signs of the transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to settled agriculture and the domestication of plants and animals. This includes the presence of farming tools, evidence of grain storage and cultivation, and the establishment of permanent settlements.
What do historians have to do with the evidence they find?
Historians use the evidence they find to analyze and interpret the past, draw conclusions, and form historical narratives. They evaluate the reliability and significance of the evidence to construct well-grounded arguments about historical events and trends. Critical thinking and interpretation are essential skills historians utilize to make sense of the past based on the information available.
Why do historians look for evidence about the distant past in myths and legend?
Historians look for evidence about the distant past in myths and legends because myths and legends tell what people believed and understood. Historians study by looking at journals, data, diaries etc., to learn information.
What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
What are the similarities between a historian of Jesus and an archaeologist?
Historians and archaeologists both, at least in principle, look for evidence and then analyse the evidence, without regard for what scriptures may say.
How do historians analyze evidence?
Historians analyze evidence by examining its reliability, relevance, and context. They assess the source of the evidence, its bias, and corroborating or contradictory evidence to form a well-supported interpretation of the past. Additionally, historians use critical thinking skills to evaluate the perspectives and motives of the sources providing the evidence.
How should historians determine which argument is superior if two arguments about an historical event contradict each other?
Historians should assess the evidence supporting each argument, consider the credibility of the sources, and evaluate the context in which the arguments were made. They may also look for consensus among other historians or seek additional evidence to support one argument over the other. Ultimately, the argument that is best supported by a preponderance of evidence and critical analysis is considered superior.
What were historians looking for to find Atlantis?
Historians have searched for archaeological evidence, ancient texts, and geological studies to locate Atlantis. They look for any clues that support the existence of a lost civilization that matches the descriptions provided by Plato in his dialogues. However, no definitive evidence has been found to confirm the existence of Atlantis as a historical reality.
What evidence shows that Phoenicia existed?
The writings of contemporary historians.
What Kinds of evidence will historians of the future study to learn about your culture?
i think, they will study what we did in life
What are techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
What types of evidence do the geographer and the historian use to explain important topics from the past in their fields?
historians might look at oral traditions, written records or photographs.geographers might look at caves , rock formations, or the earth.
How do historians identify the Neolithic revolution?
Historians identify the Neolithic Revolution through a combination of archaeological evidence and the study of ancient texts and artifacts. They look for signs of the transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to settled agriculture and the domestication of plants and animals. This includes the presence of farming tools, evidence of grain storage and cultivation, and the establishment of permanent settlements.
What do historians have to do with the evidence they find?
Historians use the evidence they find to analyze and interpret the past, draw conclusions, and form historical narratives. They evaluate the reliability and significance of the evidence to construct well-grounded arguments about historical events and trends. Critical thinking and interpretation are essential skills historians utilize to make sense of the past based on the information available.
