According to Natural Selection organisms compete to live. Now saying that, Natural Selection encompasses a whole range of competition, from competing for food to competing for mates. It is this competition as well as adapting to environments that hones in on variation and drives the change in species.
He believed that animals are the same as plants, in that some plants are grown from a seed, whilst some are self-generated. Though now, that theory has been disproved because plants are not self-generated.
Yes, and no. Yes, back then it was the most accurate possible assessment of the data available at the time. But evolutionary theory today is much different from the model that Darwin first proposed. For one thing, evolutionary theory now includes modern knowledge of genetics. For another, we no longer believe, like Darwin did, that evolution is uniformly gradual.
no. its disqualifying.. believe me ive looked. because i have one now and am trying to get in. If you have one you must wait til it heals
The word 'theory' means it is an explanatory framework for some set of observational data. As to your question: while there is an overwhelming amount of observational data supporting the general tenets of evolutionary theory, and it is now impossible to rationally reject these tenets, it will technically always remain an explanatory model - a theory.
by a theory of the BIG BANG explosion and the HELIOCENTRIC theory,that until now is being believe
since darwins time, scientists have confirmed and expanded darwins study of the distribution of plants and animals around the world in a field of study now called biogeography.
Many religions, including the Roman Catholic Church do not believe Charles Darwin Theory on Evolution. They believe, for example, that man did not evolve from a lesser species and that humans are humans before as they are now, contrary to Darwin's theory that man as we know now, evolved, through millions of years, from a lesser species (anthropoid apes).
i only know which detracted from Darwin's theory. It was his research in genetics. At Darwin's time, people believed that if someone was to have a burned ear, or his arm fell off, their offspring might have a missing arm or burned ear when born. As we know now, that is completely false, since we still carry the "good gene" (most of the time) and that there are actually things that prevent and fix cell mutations
lol im sitting in microbio right now with that q on my worksheet... i said that back then the people didn't really believe in the germ theory and through their research and evidence to help prove the germ theory to be true. that's what I wrote :) gl.!
1. I believe that theories can only be disproven, not proven. i.e. You create a theory and then you try to disprove it, if you can't then you can consider that theory to be true (convicing other people may be more difficult however). 2. I think the theory you describe is disproven as and todays equivalent is what we now know as 'oxidation'.
Most objections to evolutionary theory, now and historically, are based in religious fundamentalism, specifically the religious beliefs that have mankind be the product of special creation by some god or gods.
Because people lied to you and now you believe it.
According to Natural Selection organisms compete to live. Now saying that, Natural Selection encompasses a whole range of competition, from competing for food to competing for mates. It is this competition as well as adapting to environments that hones in on variation and drives the change in species.
people now know more about the black hole.
Because people lied to you and now you believe it.
The most popular theory is that the sea level was low enough at the time for people to walk from Siberia to Alaska, where the Bering Strait exists now.