0
They are not, in themselves. Natural selection is inferred from realtime observations of natural and experimental populations, as well as geographical distribution of traits. However, using this knowledge derived from observing realtime selection, we can formulate and test hypotheses about past selection against modern genomes.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoBecause it shows the change over time in phyla of organisms which is the definition of evolution. Common ancestry and descent with modification can be easily seen in many taxa of organisms over very long periods of time.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe fact that strongly convergent phylogenies result from independent assays of molecular, genetic and morphological features can only be explained by common descent.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How does Josiah Strong show that he supports the theory of evolution?
There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.
Why is evolution considered a theory and not a hypothesis or a law?
In science, a hypothesis and a theory differs in that a hypothesis is a conjecture based on empirical observation or theoretical derivation yet unproven or by any experimental work, and that a theory is a hypothesis that has been rigorously tested by many researchers and supported by strong evidence. Evolution is a theory that has been repeatedly tested, supported by overwhelming evidence, and can be used to explain natural phenomenon very well.
Can evolution be denied?
Any proposition can be denied by those who do not wish to accept it, no matter how strong the evidence is. However, evolution can not rationally be denied. Scientists say they regard it as fact.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What is a factor is not a strong piece of evidence for evolution?
C) Many traits of modern birds resemble the fossils of winged dinosaurs C) Many traits of modern birds resemble the fossils of winged dinosaurs
What is considered a scientific theory?
In science, a theory is something that is not fully proven, but has strong supporting evidence. Some common theories that are well known, and seen by most people as fact include; Evolution, Plate Tectonics, and Gravity. All three of these have enough evidence to be scientifically sound, but we have not yet given 100% proof to turn them from scientific theory into scientific law.
List of reasons why evolution is true?
There is strong evolutionary evidence by people such as Darwin.There is evidence in our biological structures ie: bones and DNA in particular.Although evolution (the theory) is debated there is very strong evidence (look at Darwins books and research)
How does Josiah Strong show that he supports the theory of evolution?
There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.
Why do phylogenetic trees provide strong evidence of evolution?
With the nested hierarchy of phylogenetic trees in front of you, showing in general relief the biochemical, physiological, behavioral relatedness extended from the forked nodes, and going along through time one sees evolution in action. Change over time.
How would an erratic boulder provide evidence of the flood?
Erratic boulders can provide evidence of a flood because of the distance that is measured from where they were originally placed. This could only be through a strong current of water as they are usually displaced and out of place.
Why is evolution considered a theory and not a hypothesis or a law?
In science, a hypothesis and a theory differs in that a hypothesis is a conjecture based on empirical observation or theoretical derivation yet unproven or by any experimental work, and that a theory is a hypothesis that has been rigorously tested by many researchers and supported by strong evidence. Evolution is a theory that has been repeatedly tested, supported by overwhelming evidence, and can be used to explain natural phenomenon very well.
Why is ther little evidence for the evolution of early life forms?
Because of the lack of hard parts. Geological upheaval (this affects all fossils to a certain degree ). To name two reasons that are supported by the evidence. It also hinges on what you mean as " little. " The evidence, by way of analogy, would convict a saint of murder. It is strong enough for that and strong enough to support evolutionary theory
Can evolution be denied?
Any proposition can be denied by those who do not wish to accept it, no matter how strong the evidence is. However, evolution can not rationally be denied. Scientists say they regard it as fact.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What provides strong physical evidence of evolution?
The single most compelling line of evidence for common descent in biology is the fact that all life adheres to a pattern of differences and similarities that forms a set of nested hierarchies. The same pattern is found whether one studies life's behaviour, morphology, embryological development or genetics.As for natural selection, the strong physical evidence here is that the process can be directly observed.
Why is it difficult to prove that evolution happens?
Proving that evolution happens can be challenging for a few reasons. Firstly, evolution occurs over long periods of time, making direct observation difficult. Additionally, the process of evolution involves gradual changes in populations, which can be difficult to track and measure. Lastly, the evidence for evolution is primarily based on indirect observations, such as fossil records and genetic analysis, which some skeptics may question.
What is another theory besides the theory of evolution that can't be proven but has strong evidence?
.The Question is flawed because it assumes that evolution has strong evidence in favor of the theory. The reality is that there is absolutely no scientific evidence supporting evolution. . Science is now begin to come to terms with this and is in the process of advancing alternate theories.In the April 2005 issue of Geotimes, John Chaikowsky, in an article titled "Geology vs Physics writes:"Evolutionists have 'Physics Envy." They tell the public that the science behind evolution is the same science that sent people to the moon, and cures diseases. It's not. The science behind evolution is not empirical, but forensic … no testing, no observations, no repeatability, no falsification … what the public discerns [is] that evolution is just a bunch of just-so stories disguised as legitimate science."The problem is that most evolutionists have never read The Origin of Species. Darwin himself gave us all the proof we need to show that the theory is wrong.
What is a factor is not a strong piece of evidence for evolution?
C) Many traits of modern birds resemble the fossils of winged dinosaurs C) Many traits of modern birds resemble the fossils of winged dinosaurs
Is the evolution of Magikarp strong?
yes it evolves into gyradoes
