Positive reinforcement allows people to learn good things *to* do, rather than just what to avoid. This builds people's confidence, rather than just making them afraid of everything.
When you punish people, you are exhibiting behavior that under regular circumstances is very bad, and they may learn by observation that that is ok given a reasonable excuse.
Punishment is a moral concept; someone has done something wrong and therefore deserves to suffer a punishment. Negative reinforcement is not a moral concept but a pragmatic concept; we do not want someone to do something, therefore we give them a reason not to do it, in the form of some undesired consequence. Of course, the actual process of either punishment or negative reinforcement could turn out to be exactly the same. Only the motive is different.
His theory was based on operant conditioning It had four phases....Negative Reinforcement, Posotive Reinforcement, Extinction and Punishment
You are describing 'negative reinforcement'. People very often confuse negative reinforcement with punishment. Punishment is clearly not a reinforcer in the context of operant conditioning. Negative reinforcement is. The frequency of a behavior goes up when that behavior results in the removal of a noxious stimulus. It would work for me.
ambot lang
Negative reinforcement encourages behaviors to continue with the incentive of taking away something bad. Punishment encourages bad behaviors to stop through fear of consequence. Psychologists recommend using negative reinforcement over punishment because it encourages desirable behaviors instead of removing undesirable behaviors without putting a desirable alternative in its place, and because it is based on a positive hope for reward, rather than fear of consequence.
When you punish people, you are exhibiting behavior that under regular circumstances is very bad, and they may learn by observation that that is ok given a reasonable excuse.
Different in that positive reinforcement increases a behavior and negative punishment decreases a behavior
Positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, punishment, or extinction.
Punishment is not a reinforcer. there is Negative Punishment and Positive Punishment, and also Negative Reinforcement and Positive Reinforcement.*Negative Punishment is a consequence withdrawn following a response that causes a behavior to occur with less frequency.*Negative Reinforcement is a consequence withdrawn following a response that causes a behavior to occur with greater frequency.*Positive Punishment is a consequence delivered following a response that causes a behavior to occur with less frequency.*Positive Reinforcement is a consequence delivered following a response that causes a behavior to occur with greater frequency.
People very often confuse negative reinforcement with punishment
positive and negative reinforcement and punishment
Punishment is a moral concept; someone has done something wrong and therefore deserves to suffer a punishment. Negative reinforcement is not a moral concept but a pragmatic concept; we do not want someone to do something, therefore we give them a reason not to do it, in the form of some undesired consequence. Of course, the actual process of either punishment or negative reinforcement could turn out to be exactly the same. Only the motive is different.
His theory was based on operant conditioning It had four phases....Negative Reinforcement, Posotive Reinforcement, Extinction and Punishment
no clue
You are describing 'negative reinforcement'. People very often confuse negative reinforcement with punishment. Punishment is clearly not a reinforcer in the context of operant conditioning. Negative reinforcement is. The frequency of a behavior goes up when that behavior results in the removal of a noxious stimulus. It would work for me.
b.