Lets put it this way, scientists are basically skeptics.
This means that they question the validity of most things.
So one scientist will propose a theory to explain something
and others will begin to perform experiments to prove/disprove
that theory.
As long as nobody can disprove a theory then it will be generally accepted.
This has limitations...any theory can be proposed but it has to
be reasonable as well. Usually the simplest theory is given the highest credibility.
The methods section allows the experiment to be repeated by other scientists.
The methods section allows the experiment to be repeated by other scientists.
communicating
Scientists publish papers in scientific journals or they email other scientists.
A Peer Review
Scientists, researchers, and experts within the specific field of study typically perform critical evaluation of scientific ideas and methods. This involves conducting peer reviews, replicating experiments, and analyzing data to ensure the credibility and validity of the scientific work.
other scientists
To be scientifically proven, however for your own observations and interests not really. To make a scientific hypthosis into a fact and eventually a lawyour experiment must be repeatable by other scientists (explorers/pioneers of our world
Scientists typically publish their views on classifications in peer-reviewed scientific journals, present their findings at conferences, and engage in discussions with other scientists in the field. This allows for a thorough exchange of ideas, feedback, and critiques among scientific peers.
the answer is that drawings help you understand things
It informs other scientists of its existence, and makes it easier for other scientists to find the relationships between animals
The scientific method is the most commonly used framework to guide scientific inquiries and evaluate proposed explanations by other scientists. It involves formulating a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test the hypothesis, analyzing results, and drawing conclusions based on evidence. Peer review by other scientists is also crucial for evaluating and validating scientific explanations.