Lets put it this way, scientists are basically skeptics.
This means that they question the validity of most things.
So one scientist will propose a theory to explain something
and others will begin to perform experiments to prove/disprove
that theory.
As long as nobody can disprove a theory then it will be generally accepted.
This has limitations...any theory can be proposed but it has to
be reasonable as well. Usually the simplest theory is given the highest credibility.
The methods section allows the experiment to be repeated by other scientists.
The methods section allows the experiment to be repeated by other scientists.
Scientists use repeated trials to ensure the reliability of their results by conducting the same experiment multiple times under the same conditions. For example, if testing a new drug, researchers might administer it to several groups of subjects and repeat the trials to confirm consistent effects. Replication involves other scientists independently conducting the same experiment to verify findings; for instance, if a study claims a certain treatment is effective, other labs will attempt to replicate the results to validate the initial claims. Both practices help minimize errors and biases, enhancing the credibility of scientific conclusions.
communicating
Scientists publish papers in scientific journals or they email other scientists.
Scientists, researchers, and experts within the specific field of study typically perform critical evaluation of scientific ideas and methods. This involves conducting peer reviews, replicating experiments, and analyzing data to ensure the credibility and validity of the scientific work.
A Peer Review
To be scientifically proven, however for your own observations and interests not really. To make a scientific hypthosis into a fact and eventually a lawyour experiment must be repeatable by other scientists (explorers/pioneers of our world
other scientists
Scientists prove or disprove claims through the scientific method, which involves formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and collecting data. They analyze the results to see if they support or contradict the original claims. Peer review and replication of studies by other researchers are also crucial for validating findings. Ultimately, claims are accepted or rejected based on empirical evidence and reproducibility.
Scientists typically publish their views on classifications in peer-reviewed scientific journals, present their findings at conferences, and engage in discussions with other scientists in the field. This allows for a thorough exchange of ideas, feedback, and critiques among scientific peers.
the answer is that drawings help you understand things