Brain plasticity, also called neuroplasticity, cortical plasticity and cortical re-mapping, is a term used to describe the way the brain organizes itself in response to experience. More specifically, "neuro" stands for neuron, the nerve cells in our brains and nervous centers, and "plasticity" for changeable or malleable. Since scientists began to study the brain, the idea was fairly set in stone that it was hardwired to respond in certain ways, and much like a computer, when one drive failed, that drive and all of it's information was gone for good. The knowledge (read synaptic connections) contained in that portion of the brain would be wiped out if damaged, to never be regained. Looking back now, it seems surprising that people who could easily grasp that the brain grows both in physical size and knowledge from childhood to adulthood, would assume that such an amazing organ was as unchanging as a machine. When scientists in the late 60s and early 70s began to discover that the brain was able to change what parts it used for different activities, switching over to other areas as the previously used portions stopped working or were utilized for different functions, the idea of brain plasticity was born. Now decades of research have given credence to the idea that the brain changes in reaction to new situations or in counterbalance to brain injury. Thinking, learning and even acting change not only the brain's organization but its actual physical structure. Called "maps", the way the sensory system in the brain is organized changes with stimulus, often moving from one part of the brain to the other. Picture a map overlaying the brain, then move it from one area to another and you have an idea of how it works. No longer are we limited by the idea of a never changing mind… we can now work on various aspects that are poorly formed or badly damaged with the hope of creating the necessary connections in some other part of the brain - a part capable of the needed responses.
the period that scientist believe HORTICULTURE began was in the LATE ARCHAIC PERIOD
well the reason why they try to prove that God is fake is because they are just wanting to get more and more people to believe them and the more that people believe them the sponsors they get and then the more sponsors that they get the more money they get. but at times it is funny because they end up proving them selves wrong.The premise of the question is wrong. Scientist are not trying to prove anything about the nature of God or the supernatural. Scientist are trying to answers questions about the material universe with materialistic answers.
Scientist believed that, the main reason for the acceptance of superstition believes is to prevent people from danger.E.g The believe that ''when you are bathing you don't sing''.Scientist explained that those days the chemical used to manufacture soaps are very harmful for humans if they come in contact with it.
I believe it is Pavlov ^^ Close, but Pavlov is better associated with classical conditioning while I believe B.F. Skinner is most associated with operant conditioning.
Scientists see the world as what it is; laypeople view it according to what they believe it is.
A scientist may or may not believe in God. A non-scientist also may or may not believe in God.
what do scientist believe is happening to the segments of the earths crust
the period that scientist believe HORTICULTURE began was in the LATE ARCHAIC PERIOD
you will be crazy and lots of things in your mind an scientist does not believe of gods
To get them in the position in which they are today, political leader or scientist, must have very important well skills around daily based problems. But the teaching of children is much more important than what scientist and political leaders believe. Sure they are gifted and smart people, they would of course have to be to become such a job, but to learn from what they believe is something wrong. People should learn in what they believe in. But then if scientist have found the cure for cancer, to teach of this inhabit will create an amazing effect on daily based lives of younger children. It really just depends on what that particular person chooses to believe in to whether they learn from political leaders or scientists. :)
As far as i know, all christians believe that.
Scientist do belive there is a bigfoot and i saw one in person
If a scientist were to be dishonest, would people really believe his findings?
I believe the benefits of such is the stimulation of the brain. When you are imagining your brain functions and you exercise it. In Children it brings joy and creativity in them that is vital during development.
scientist still are trying to find out is what i heard last.
Scientist believe that yes, this may have a big impact on children than adults ageing from 5-10 due to soft tissues in the brain.
AIDS.