0
Why do scientist repeat their findings aren't they confident about the result of their findings?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
They need to double check and double check. Maybe some thing has come up and so they double check.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A scientist publishes the result of an experiment Which science skill is this?
Communicating
What changes happen at the time as a result of this scientist work?
what changes happened at the time as a result of this scientists work
What should you do next when the experiment get an unexpected result?
you must repeat and redo the experiment
What is the result when a scientist gains new information about a theory?
The theory is modified.
Explain why it is important to use constants in an experiment?
so scientist can compare result
Why do scientist sometimes need to repeat a experiment?
To make sure that it yields the same result each time.
Can you make a sentence with repeat reward respect and result?
You have to respect the person with the result of winning a repeat reward.
What is the meaning of legal word 'findings'?
The meaning of the legal word findings is the result or decision made by deliberations of a jury or court.
What you need to do if your medical result findings that you have a pleural thickening?
What your doctor tells you to do.
Why must scientists be confident?
On television, the scientist is able to find the answer every time and make amazing discoveries within the hour of the TV program. But in real life, it may take a long while to get a positive result... or you may not get one and you may need to abandon your hypothesis and try something new. As a scientist, you must be confident because otherwise, you will give up every time an experiment does not go well or a hypothesis does not work out. A scientist needs to believe in his or her ability to find the correct answer, and even when things seem difficult, the scientist should be able to keep pursuing the facts and not become too discouraged.
What are findings from an experiment called?
Experimental findings are usually called data which is the plural of datum. Once they have been analyzed they might be summarized into a new hypothesis which could be presented as a result.
What is the meaning of non-neoplastic findings?
Non-neoplasm findings is an abnormal mass of tissue that was not formed as a result of neoplasia. A neoplasm tumor is an abnormal growth of cells or an abnormal division of cells.
Why do scientist communicate findings?
The days are long past in which a scientist could carry forward knowledge of a field as a solo effort. Science is a collaborative project where thousands of individuals each contribute small pieces of a massive puzzle. An unpublished result is effectively cut off from this project and contributes nothing to the accumulation of knowledge. When one scientist publishes a finding, others are able to build upon it, incorporate its ideas, and adjust their on-going research accordingly. Scientists are constantly adjusting their own research plans in the light of the announcements by other scientists. A second reason for communication is that it permits outside verification and correction. Other scientists will be able to see the results and will often attempt to reproduce them. If other scientists succeed in reproducing the results, the certainty we may have in the data is greatly increased, if they fail to reproduce the results or find opposing results, then we have avoided placing excess certainty on a possibly invalid result. No one person has all the answers and by subjecting one's findings to assessment by the entire scientific community, others may correct, develop, and enhance one's findings. Lastly, there are the real world personal and economic reasons. Scientists may be involved in the pursuit of knowledge, but most are also in the pursuit of fame and job security. For a professional scientist (and virtually all scientists earn their livings through research) to not publish their findings is comparable to a real estate agent not selling houses. Their pay, their prestige, their careers are entirely dependent upon their ability to publish their results. One of the primary criteria used by peers and research institutions to judge a scientist's merits is by the quality of their publications. Thus, a scientist who does not communicate their findings is a scientist who has absolutely no respect from his or her peers and is also a scientist who's bosses and funding agencies are no doubt beginning to wonder what that scientist is doing with all the money they're giving him/her. A scientist without a track record of quality publications is a scientist who will not be able to secure funding and not be able attract high quality students and researchers to their lab.
A scientist publishes the result of an experiment Which science skill is this?
Communicating
What can scientist do if the result of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What changes happen at the time as a result of this scientist work?
what changes happened at the time as a result of this scientists work
What should you do next when the experiment get an unexpected result?
you must repeat and redo the experiment
